Agents that target VEGF receptors (e.g. bevacizumab) and multi-angiokinase inhibitors (e.g. nintedanib) recently demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of malignant mesothelioma in early phase trials [10, 11].
These findings prompted Chia et al. [12] to assess the prognostic implications of VEGF, PDGF, FGF, and the angiogenesis marker, CD31, in malignant mesothelioma. They used formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 329 patients to create tissue microarrays. All patients underwent surgical resection or biopsy for malignant mesothelioma between 1988 and 2014. IHC staining via the H-score method was used to analyse VEGF, PDGF, FGFR-1, and CD31 expression. The discriminatory threshold was set for each IHC stain, and samples were classified as low (below median) or high expression (above median). Chalkey’s method [13] was used to evaluate CD31 IHC microvessel density. The final Chalkey score was the mean of three separate counts.
Out of 302 samples, 31 (10.3%) had a high (≥5) CD31 score, regardless of histology. It was associated with significantly poorer survival in all histology groups (OS 12 vs 8.6 months; HR 0.48; P=0.0044). In the epithelioid subgroup, a high CD31 score was also associated with significantly poorer survival (OS 14.7 vs 10.1 months; HR 0.69, P=0.01). Of 310 tumour samples, 303 (98%) were classified as PDGF-CC IHC positive (>5% cells stained). Of all samples, 203 (65%) had high (≥150) PDGF-CC. However, the rate was higher in tumours with an epithelioid histology (129/203, 64%).
Data showed a non-significant trend toward poorer survival for patients with epithelioid tumours with increased PDGF-CC expression (high ≥150; low <150). OS was 18.5 months vs 13.2 (HR 0.7928; P=0.110). There were no associations between survival and VEGF IHC or FGFR-1 IHC, and no differences between histological subtypes. This evaluation showed significant expression of vascular and stromal biomarkers in malignant mesothelioma, with high PDGF-CC expression and CD31 scores associated with poor survival. Inhibiting these pathways may have prognostic implications.
- Zalcman G, et al. Lancet 2016;387:1405-1414.
- Grosso F, et al. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:3591-3600.
- Chia PL, Cancer Res 2018;78 Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2018, Chicago.
- Fox SB. Methods Mol Med 2001;46:29-46.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Potential for brigatinib as a first-line treatment option for ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer Next Article
Avelumab vs docetaxel for previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer »
« Potential for brigatinib as a first-line treatment option for ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer Next Article
Avelumab vs docetaxel for previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer »
Table of Contents: WCLC 2018
Featured articles
Interview with the IASCL President, Dr. Giorgio Scagliotti
Presidential Symposium – Top 5 abstracts
Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy extends OS in stage 3, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer
Potential for brigatinib as a first-line treatment option for ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer
Benefits of chest CT screening
New standard of care in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer
No progression-free survival benefit with nintedanib plus pemetrexed/cisplatin for malignant pleural mesothelioma of epithelial subtype
New Aspects of Immunotherapy
Next generation immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer
Combination therapies: Where are we in 2018?
Choice of taxane and addition of pembrolizumab for metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer
New Aspects of Targeted Therapy
PD-L1 expression in untreated EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer and response to osimertinib
Mesothelioma
Unmet needs in surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma
Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Novel Therapies in ROS1 and EGFR
Advances in Small-cell and Neuroendocrine Tumours
Related Articles
June 25, 2019
Incidence and local treatment
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com