Home > Oncology > WCLC 2018 > New Aspects of Targeted Therapy > PD-L1 expression in untreated EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer and response to osimertinib

PD-L1 expression in untreated EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer and response to osimertinib

Presented by
Prof. Suresh Ramalingam, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, USA
Conference
WCLC 2018
Trial
Phase 3, FLAURA


Prof. Suresh Ramalingam (Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, USA) presented data on PD-L1 expression in untreated EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) advanced NSCLC. He also discussed response to osimertinib compared with standard EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the phase 3 FLAURA trial [1]. “Where does immunotherapy fit in patients with EGFR mutations and other driver events?” asked Prof. Ramalingam. “This is a key, clinically important question.”



Osimertinib is an oral, third-generation, CNS-active EGFR TKI that potently and selectively inhibits both EGFR TKI sensitising and EGFR T790M resistance mutations [1-5]. “The benefit of EGFR TKIs in treatment-naïve, EGFRm, PD-L1 positive patients is of high clinical interest,” Prof. Ramalingam said. A recent study of pembrolizumab in EGFR TKI-naïve patients with EGFRm and PD-L1 positive-advanced NSCLC failed to demonstrate efficacy [6]. “It was halted early,” said Prof. Ramalingam.

However, the FLAURA trial showed that osimertinib significantly improved PFS compared to standard of care EGFR TKIs in patients with untreated Ex19de/L858R-positive (EGFRm) NSCLC [1].

Participants with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC who were positive for EGFRm and PD-L1 were stratified by mutation type and race (Asian/non-Asian) before being randomised to treatment. Exploratory endpoints included measurement of PD-L1 expression in freshly sectioned archival tumour tissue samples and assessment of clinical outcome by PD-L1 expression. Samples with tumour cell (TC) staining ≥1% were defined as PD-L1 expressers.

PD-L1 expression was lower in EGFRm-positive samples than in EGRFm-negative ones. It was also uncommon at higher thresholds (TC≥25% or TC≥50%) in EGRFm-positive samples. There were no progression-free survival (PFS) assessments in patients randomised to treatment with PD-L1 TC≥25% or TC≥50% tumours; there were too few of them to perform the analysis.

Patients who received osimertinib showed PFS benefit regardless of PD-L1 expression (see Figure). According to Prof. Ramalingam, these outcomes support the following conclusions:

  • EGFRm testing is critical prior to treatment initiation in all patients with advanced NSCLC; and
  • osimertinib should be used as first-line treatment of patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 status.
Figure: Patients received PFS benefit from osimertinib, regardless of PD-L1 expression [1]

WCLC 2018: Figure 6 FIRST Osimertinib vs standard of care, PD-L1 expressers

WCLC 2018: Figure 6 SECOND Osimertinib vs standard of care, PD-L1 negative

WCLC 2018: Figure 6 THIRD Osimertinib vs standard of care, PD-L1 unknown


  1. Soria JC, et al. N Engl J Med 2018;378:113-125.
  2. Cross DA, et al. Cancer Discov 2014;4:1046-1061.
  3. Mok TS, et al. GN Engl J Med 2017;376:629-640.
  4. Wu YL, et al. J Clin Oncol 2018:JCO2018777326.
  5. Reungwetwattana T, et al. J Clin Oncol 2018:JCO2018783118.
  6. Lisberg A, et al. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13:1138-1145.




Posted on