Urologists may be reluctant to implant an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) in diabetic patients because of higher risk for infections [1]. Common practice is to screen patients for glycated haemoglobin A1c and blood glucose prior to surgery. Dr Mahmoud Osman et al. (Assiut University, Egypt) demonstrated that this precaution is not necessary and that comorbidity scores are a better predictor for infections and other complications. In support, the work of Dr Mohamad Habous et al. (Jedda, Saudi Arabia) similarly affirmed that the Charlson Comorbidity Index is a stronger predictor of outcome in 716 diabetic patients undergoing IPP in 15 US institutes and in a retrospective series (n=218) by high-volume surgeons in Jedda.
The current American Urology Association guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of infections in diabetic patients that have undergone a penile prosthesis recommend gentamicin and vancomycin. A study by Prof. Thomas Ahlering and colleagues (University of California at Irvine, USA) showed that when you use this protocol there is a very high 7.7% infection rate, but when you add fluoroquinolone to the combination it drops to 1%. This abstract might be practice-changing and guideline-changing in the near future.
Which patient will benefit the most from IPP implantation?
Dr Frederico Dehò et al. (Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Italy) presented an abstract of the Italian registry of penile implants, currently at 265 patients operated on by 45 surgeons [2]. This study showed that patients with post-pelvic surgery or radiotherapy are more satisfied with their surgery and are reported higher quality of life measures when operated at high-volume centres. This prospective registry is now being expanded to the European setting within the PHOENIX study registry. There was a call to all urologists who perform implants to please get involved with PHOENIX for the best opportunities to improve best practice. Endpoints of PHOENIX will be patient satisfaction score at 12 weeks and 1 year after implantation, and then subsequently every 2 years of follow-up for 9 years.
- Lipsky MJ et al. Sex Med. 2019 Mar;7(1):35-40.
- Pescatori E et al. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016 Jul 4;88(2):122-7.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Adjuvant therapy in triple-negative breast cancer Next Article
Adjuvant Her2-targeted therapy »
« Adjuvant therapy in triple-negative breast cancer Next Article
Adjuvant Her2-targeted therapy »
Table of Contents: EAU 2019
Featured articles
Prostate Cancer
Barentsz Trial – Bi-parametric MRI versus multi-parametric MRI
Enzalutamide plus ADT improves outcomes for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Prostate cancer active surveillance: Better patient risk stratification and use of imaging
The role of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: Extended vs standard
When to use imaging and imaging-guided therapies
Radioguided surgery is the future?
Bladder Cancer
Largest safety study of its kind with atezolizumab in metastatic bladder cancer
Bladder cancer risk and early detection
Consensus treatment pathway for patients with limited pelvic lymph node involvement in otherwise localised bladder cancer
FGFR3 gene mutation: Favourable prognostic impact in bladder cancer
Bladder cancer in young patients
Spanish study directly links surgical volume with mortality in bladder cancer patients undergoing cystectomy
Updated interim results of phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab for high-risk NMIBC unresponsive to BCG
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy or open radical cystectomy?
Renal Transplantation and Renal Cell Carcinoma
Andrology
Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE)
Male infertility/Premature ejaculation
Testosterone replacement therapy: Safe and maybe even protective
Focus on treatment of erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease
Penile prosthesis implantation
Functional Urology
Decision aids are too difficult for patients
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
The Urodynamics for Prostate Surgery Trial
Minimally invasive surgical techniques must compete against pharmacotherapy in benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH)
Related Articles
July 22, 2022
Fewer complications with robotic surgery in renal cancer
September 17, 2021
Enfortumab vedotin may trigger rare, severe skin reactions
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com