https://doi.org/10.55788/7e8ac5d6
The phase 3 OpeRa trial (NCT03849820) was designed to show the superiority of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) to open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in patients with intermediate or high complexity kidney tumours. Prof. Marc-Oliver Grimm (Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany) presented the results. Due to slow enrolment, only 240 patients instead of the indicated 606 patients were randomised 1:1 to RAPN or OPN. In total, 95% of patients in the RAPN group and 77% of patients in the OPN group received the anticipated treatment. The 30-day post-operative complication rate was the primary endpoint of the trial.
A trend towards a reduced 30-day complication rate was observed in favour of the RAPN arm (36.6% vs 46.1%; P=0.175). This effect was mostly driven by a decreased rate of grade 1 (OPN 19.1% vs RAPN 11.6%) and grade 2 (19.1% vs 13.4%) adverse events (AEs) in the RAPN arm. The corresponding grade 3-a, grade 3-b, and grade 4-a AE rates were comparable between the 2 arms, with 3.4%, 3.4%, and 1.1% in the OPN arm and 5.4%, 4.5%, and 1.8% in the RAPN arm, respectively. A substantial difference between AEs ‘possibly or definitely’ related to treatment was observed to the benefit of those who received RAPN (37.1% vs 23.2%; P=0.032). Also, the number of post-operative hospital days to discharge was lower in patients who received RAPN (7 vs 6; P<0.001). In contrast, the median operating time was significantly longer in the RAPN arm (167 vs 122 minutes; P<0.001).
Prof. Grimm concluded that, although underpowered, the trial showed a clear trend for fewer complications with robotic surgery compared with open surgery in patients with intermediate or high complexity renal tumours. Analyses of postoperative pain medication, patient-reported outcomes, and quality of life are ongoing.
- Grimm M-O, et al. Complications with open versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (OpeRa) in patients with intermediate/high-complexity kidney tumours. Game-changing session 1, EAU 2022, 01–04 July.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Novel therapeutic targets for benign prostatic hyperplasia Next Article
KEYNOTE-564: Updated results of adjuvant pembrolizumab in RCC »
« Novel therapeutic targets for benign prostatic hyperplasia Next Article
KEYNOTE-564: Updated results of adjuvant pembrolizumab in RCC »
Table of Contents: EAU 2022
Featured articles
Darolutamide performs well across subgroups in mHSPC
Genitourinary Cancer
Does systematic biopsy add value to the detection rate of prostate cancer?
PSMA PET/CT cannot replace mpMRI for diagnosis of prostate cancer
Prostate cancer treatments reduce quality of life
PROpel: Good results for abiraterone plus olaparib in mCRPC
Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy promising in high-risk prostate cancer
Darolutamide performs well across subgroups in mHSPC
Shorter hospital stay with robotic surgery versus open surgery in bladder cancer
Improved risk stratification for high-risk NMIBC
Adjuvant atezolizumab may benefit ctDNA-positive patients with post-op muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma
New prognostication in N3 penile cancer
KEYNOTE-564: Updated results of adjuvant pembrolizumab in RCC
Fewer complications with robotic surgery in renal cancer
Functional Urology
Novel therapeutic targets for benign prostatic hyperplasia
Mini-slings non-inferior to standard mid-urethral slings in SUI
Non-inferiority of methenamine hippurate to antibiotics in recurrent UTIs
Related Articles
September 17, 2021
Enfortumab vedotin may trigger rare, severe skin reactions
January 27, 2022
Doctors successfully transplant pig kidney into brain-dead man
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com