Up to 40% of patients who undergo radical prostatectomy and up to 50% of patients who undergo radiation therapy will develop local or distant recurrences within 10 years [1]. The ability to determine the extent and location of recurrent prostate cancer is key for appropriate clinical management. However, conventional imaging techniques have many limitations in prostate cancer identification and localisation, and greater imaging accuracy is needed throughout the care continuum to optimise therapeutic decision‐making.
The SPOTLIGHT study (NCT04186845) aimed to evaluate 18F‐rhPSMA‐7.3 PET imaging as a potential decision‐making aid by determining suspected biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer across a wide PSA range. Enrolled were 389 men with a history of localised prostate cancer with prior curative-intent treatment, an elevated PSA suspicious of biochemical recurrence (median PSA 1.10 ng/mL), and who were potentially eligible for salvage therapy with curative intent. All patients underwent PET for 50–70 minutes after IV administration of 296 MBq 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 [2]. Coprimary endpoints were the Correct Detection Rate (CDR; i.e. percentage of patients scanned with ≥1 true positive lesion) and Positive Predictive Value (PPV; i.e. all PET-positive regions combined) of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 using histopathology and/or conventional imaging as a composite standard of truth (SoT). These metrics were also evaluated in a subset of patients with a histopathology-only SoT. Prespecified statistical thresholds of at least 36.5% and 62.5% were set for CDR and PPV, respectively. Overall detection rate stratified by PSA was also documented. Dr David Schuster (Emory University School of Medicine, GA, USA) presented the results [1].
In 389 men who had an evaluable 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 scan, the overall detection rate was 83% by majority read (see Figure). In 366 men with a composite SoT, the CDR was 56.8%, meeting the prespecified threshold. The PPV was 59.7%, not meeting the prespecified threshold. In the subset of patients with a histopathology-only SoT, the CDR and PPV were higher at 81.2% and 71.6%, respectively. Both of these values met the prespecified thresholds.
Figure: Overall detection rate with 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET [1]
There were no serious adverse events related to 18F-rhPSMA-7.3. The most frequently reported adverse events were hypertension (1.8%), diarrhoea (1.0%), injection site reaction (0.5%), and headache (0.5%).
Based on these results, Dr Schuster concluded that 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 has a clinically meaningful CDR that meets the prespecified threshold. Overall detection rates are high even at low PSA values. Together, these results support the clinical utility of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET in men with recurrent prostate cancer across a wide PSA range.
- Schuster DM, et al. Detection Rate of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer Recurrence: Results from a Phase 3, Prospective, Multicenter Study (SPOTLIGHT). Abstract 9, ASCO GU 2022, 17–19 February.
- Eiber M, et al. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:696-701.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« PSMA PET is a predictive biomarker in mCRPC progressing after docetaxel Next Article
Continued enzalutamide plus docetaxel offers clinical benefit for mCRPC patients who progress on enzalutamide »
« PSMA PET is a predictive biomarker in mCRPC progressing after docetaxel Next Article
Continued enzalutamide plus docetaxel offers clinical benefit for mCRPC patients who progress on enzalutamide »
Table of Contents: ASCO GU 2022
Featured articles
Prostate Cancer
First-line treatment with olaparib significantly improves PFS in mCRPC
First-line treatment with niraparib significantly improves PFS in HRR-mutated mCRPC
Darolutamide improves OS in mHSPC
Continued enzalutamide plus docetaxel offers clinical benefit for mCRPC patients who progress on enzalutamide
Radiohybrid PSMA PET imaging has favourable detection rate for prostate cancer recurrence
PSMA PET is a predictive biomarker in mCRPC progressing after docetaxel
Artificial intelligence improves prediction of long-term outcomes
Significant tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer
Addition of abiraterone to ADT/docetaxel does not increase bone loss
Bavdegalutamide, a novel androgen receptor degrader, demonstrates clinical activity
Urothelial Carcinoma
No benefit of olaparib in previously untreated, platinum-ineligible, metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Rucaparib maintenance therapy extends PFS in platinum-responsive metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Positive efficacy and safety of N-803 plus BCG infusion in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC
Adding lenvatinib to pembrolizumab does not improve survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Maintenance niraparib fails to improve PFS in advanced urothelial cancer
First-line avelumab shows clinical activity in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Favourable pathologic response rate with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Second-line nivolumab/ipilimumab boost improves ORR in metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Sacituzumab govitecan effective in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer
Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin promising in MIBC ineligible for cisplatin
Renal Cell Carcinoma
High-risk early RCC may benefit from neoadjuvant avelumab plus axitinib
DFS benefits with adjuvant pembrolizumab in RCC persist with longer follow-up
Biomarkers predict response to immune nivolumab (± ipilimumab) in advanced RCC
Combined nivolumab/axitinib treatment elicits good response in metastatic RCC
Folliculin mutations not associated with sporadic chromophobe RCC
Differential patterns of molecular alterations among sites of metastasis in RCC
Nivolumab monotherapy represents an alternative first-line treatment option for treatment-naïve mRCC
Penile & Testicular Cancer
HPV-positive and HPV-negative penile squamous cell carcinoma are molecularly distinct tumours
Atezolizumab does not improve survival in advanced penile cancer
Biomarkers to distinguish necrosis from teratoma before pcRPLND in testicular cancer
Related Articles
March 24, 2021
Signature DNA alterations in subtypes of bladder cancer
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com