Patients with mCRPC treated in the first-line setting have a median survival of approximately 3 years in clinical trials. However, in clinical practice, approximately half of these patients receive only 1 line of active therapy, achieving a median survival of less than 2 years [1]. Recently, olaparib monotherapy has demonstrated to improve survival in patients with mCRPC with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations, post-next-generation hormonal agents [2,3]. In addition, the combination of olaparib plus abiraterone following docetaxel has shown to prolong rPFS irrespective of HRR mutational status [4].
The phase 3 PROpel study (NCT03732820) evaluates the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitor olaparib plus abiraterone in the first-line mCRPC setting. The trial enrolled 796 mCRPC patients who failed primary androgen deprivation therapy, independent of HRR status. Participants were 1:1 randomised to receive olaparib plus abiraterone or placebo plus abiraterone. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed rPFS. Dr Fred Saad (Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Canada) presented the first results [5].
Baseline patient characteristics were well-balanced between treatment arms (see Table). This planned interim analysis showed first-line treatment with olaparib plus abiraterone to significantly prolong rPFS versus placebo plus abiraterone (24.8 vs 16.6 months; HR 0.66; P<0.0001). Predefined subgroup analyses showed rPFS improvement across all subgroups, including participants with and without HRR mutations. A sensitivity analysis of rPFS by blinded independent central review showed similar results as the primary analysis (HR 0.61; P=0.004). The overall survival (OS) data is currently immature with 228 deaths (28.6%). A trend was observed in OS, favouring olaparib plus abiraterone (HR 0.86; P=0.29). The secondary endpoints of time to first subsequent treatment (HR 0.74; P=0.004) and time to second PFS or death (HR 0.69; P=0.0184) suggested long-term benefits of olaparib plus abiraterone. The overall response rate was 48.1% in the placebo arm versus 58.4% in the olaparib arm.
Table: Baseline patient characteristics in PROpel [5]

The most common grade ≥3 adverse event reported was anaemia (15.1 vs 3.3% for olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone). Quality of life was comparable between treatment arms over time.
“This interim analysis shows PROpel met its primary objective, demonstrating significant improvement in rPFS for olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone in patients with newly detected mCRPC who had not received prior first-line, irrespective of HRR status,” commented Dr Saad. “These results demonstrate the benefit of olaparib plus abiraterone without the need for HRR stratification in first-line treatment of mCRPC.”
Commenting on the results of PROpel and MAGNITUDE, discussant Dr Celestia Higano (University of British Columbia, Canada) cautioned to be aware of the differences in design between the 2 studies. In MAGNITUDE, HRR status was used to allocate patients to a cohort, while in PROpel patients were randomised regardless of their HRR status (which appeared to be well balanced in the end). In addition, due to the pre-specified futility analysis planned in the HRR-negative population in MAGNITUDE, the enrolment in this cohort was stopped after 200 patients (of the planned 600 patients). As a result, patient populations are not comparable in MAGNITUDE and PROpel, which could explain the differences in the results.
- Shore ND, et al. Adv Ther 2021;38:4520–4540.
- de Bono JS, et al. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2091–2102.
- Hussain M, et al. N Engl J Med 2020;383:2345–2357.
- Clarke N, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:975–986.
- Saad F, et al. PROpel: Phase III trial of olaparib (ola) and abiraterone (abi) versus placebo (pbo) and abi as first-line (1L) therapy for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Abstract 11, ASCO GU 2022, 17–19 February.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« First-line treatment with niraparib significantly improves PFS in HRR-mutated mCRPC Next Article
Letter from the Editor »
« First-line treatment with niraparib significantly improves PFS in HRR-mutated mCRPC Next Article
Letter from the Editor »
Table of Contents: ASCO GU 2022
Featured articles
Prostate Cancer
First-line treatment with olaparib significantly improves PFS in mCRPC
First-line treatment with niraparib significantly improves PFS in HRR-mutated mCRPC
Darolutamide improves OS in mHSPC
Continued enzalutamide plus docetaxel offers clinical benefit for mCRPC patients who progress on enzalutamide
Radiohybrid PSMA PET imaging has favourable detection rate for prostate cancer recurrence
PSMA PET is a predictive biomarker in mCRPC progressing after docetaxel
Artificial intelligence improves prediction of long-term outcomes
Significant tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer
Addition of abiraterone to ADT/docetaxel does not increase bone loss
Bavdegalutamide, a novel androgen receptor degrader, demonstrates clinical activity
Urothelial Carcinoma
No benefit of olaparib in previously untreated, platinum-ineligible, metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Rucaparib maintenance therapy extends PFS in platinum-responsive metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Positive efficacy and safety of N-803 plus BCG infusion in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC
Adding lenvatinib to pembrolizumab does not improve survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Maintenance niraparib fails to improve PFS in advanced urothelial cancer
First-line avelumab shows clinical activity in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Favourable pathologic response rate with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Second-line nivolumab/ipilimumab boost improves ORR in metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Sacituzumab govitecan effective in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer
Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin promising in MIBC ineligible for cisplatin
Renal Cell Carcinoma
High-risk early RCC may benefit from neoadjuvant avelumab plus axitinib
DFS benefits with adjuvant pembrolizumab in RCC persist with longer follow-up
Biomarkers predict response to immune nivolumab (± ipilimumab) in advanced RCC
Combined nivolumab/axitinib treatment elicits good response in metastatic RCC
Folliculin mutations not associated with sporadic chromophobe RCC
Differential patterns of molecular alterations among sites of metastasis in RCC
Nivolumab monotherapy represents an alternative first-line treatment option for treatment-naïve mRCC
Penile & Testicular Cancer
HPV-positive and HPV-negative penile squamous cell carcinoma are molecularly distinct tumours
Atezolizumab does not improve survival in advanced penile cancer
Biomarkers to distinguish necrosis from teratoma before pcRPLND in testicular cancer
Related Articles
November 25, 2020
Second- and third-line treatment options in mUC

© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com