Home > Oncology > ASCO GU 2022 > Urothelial Carcinoma > Adding lenvatinib to pembrolizumab does not improve survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma

Adding lenvatinib to pembrolizumab does not improve survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma

Presented by
Dr Yohann Loriot, Institut Gustave Roussy, France
Conference
ASCO GU 2022
Trial
Phase 3, LEAP-011
Results from the phase 3 LEAP-011 trial showed that the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab induced comparable anti-tumour activity compared with placebo plus pembrolizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy.

Pembrolizumab is an approved first-line therapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who are ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy [1]. Lenvatinib, a multiple-receptor kinase inhibitor, has shown anti-tumour activity in several solid tumours [2]. When combined with pembrolizumab, lenvatinib showed promising early activity and manageable safety in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, regardless of PD-L1 status, in the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-146 trial [3].

The phase 3 LEAP-011 trial (NCT03898180) aimed to examine the combination of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib in the first-line setting for patients with histologically-confirmed advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy. A total of 497 patients who were cisplatin-ineligible with tumours expressing PD-L1 (combined positive score ≥10) or were ineligible to receive platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status were enrolled in LEAP-011. Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib or pembrolizumab plus placebo. The dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Dr Yohann Loriot (Institut Gustave Roussy, France) presented the results of LEAP-011 [4].

Median PFS was 4.5 months in the pembrolizumab/lenvatinib arm versus 4.0 months in the pembrolizumab/placebo arm (HR 0.90). Median OS was 11.8 months with pembrolizumab/lenvatinib versus 12.9 months with pembrolizumab/placebo (HR 1.14). The overall response rate was 33.1% versus 28.9%, respectively.

Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 87.6% of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib-treated patients arm and in 69.0% of pembrolizumab/placebo-treated patients.

Based on these results, the data-monitoring committee recommended to stop further enrolment of patients in LEAP-011. “The benefit/risk ratio for adding lenvatinib to pembrolizumab was not considered positive in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who are platinum-ineligible,” concluded Dr Loriot. “Therefore, pembrolizumab monotherapy remains the standard of care as first-line therapy in these patients.”

  1. Vuky J, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:2658–2666.
  2. Zschäbitz S, et al. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2018;211:187–198.
  3. Taylor MH, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1154–1163.
  4. Loriot, Y, et al. First-line pembrolizumab (pembro) with or without lenvatinib (lenva) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (LEAP-011): A phase 3, randomized, double-blind study. Abstract 432, ASCO GU 2022, 17–19 February.

 

Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers



Posted on