Pembrolizumab is an approved first-line therapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who are ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy [1]. Lenvatinib, a multiple-receptor kinase inhibitor, has shown anti-tumour activity in several solid tumours [2]. When combined with pembrolizumab, lenvatinib showed promising early activity and manageable safety in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, regardless of PD-L1 status, in the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-146 trial [3].
The phase 3 LEAP-011 trial (NCT03898180) aimed to examine the combination of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib in the first-line setting for patients with histologically-confirmed advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy. A total of 497 patients who were cisplatin-ineligible with tumours expressing PD-L1 (combined positive score ≥10) or were ineligible to receive platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status were enrolled in LEAP-011. Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib or pembrolizumab plus placebo. The dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Dr Yohann Loriot (Institut Gustave Roussy, France) presented the results of LEAP-011 [4].
Median PFS was 4.5 months in the pembrolizumab/lenvatinib arm versus 4.0 months in the pembrolizumab/placebo arm (HR 0.90). Median OS was 11.8 months with pembrolizumab/lenvatinib versus 12.9 months with pembrolizumab/placebo (HR 1.14). The overall response rate was 33.1% versus 28.9%, respectively.
Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 87.6% of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib-treated patients arm and in 69.0% of pembrolizumab/placebo-treated patients.
Based on these results, the data-monitoring committee recommended to stop further enrolment of patients in LEAP-011. “The benefit/risk ratio for adding lenvatinib to pembrolizumab was not considered positive in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who are platinum-ineligible,” concluded Dr Loriot. “Therefore, pembrolizumab monotherapy remains the standard of care as first-line therapy in these patients.”
- Vuky J, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:2658–2666.
- Zschäbitz S, et al. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2018;211:187–198.
- Taylor MH, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1154–1163.
- Loriot, Y, et al. First-line pembrolizumab (pembro) with or without lenvatinib (lenva) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (LEAP-011): A phase 3, randomized, double-blind study. Abstract 432, ASCO GU 2022, 17–19 February.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Maintenance niraparib fails to improve PFS in advanced urothelial cancer Next Article
Positive efficacy and safety of N-803 plus BCG infusion in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC »
« Maintenance niraparib fails to improve PFS in advanced urothelial cancer Next Article
Positive efficacy and safety of N-803 plus BCG infusion in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC »
Table of Contents: ASCO GU 2022
Featured articles
Prostate Cancer
First-line treatment with olaparib significantly improves PFS in mCRPC
First-line treatment with niraparib significantly improves PFS in HRR-mutated mCRPC
Darolutamide improves OS in mHSPC
Continued enzalutamide plus docetaxel offers clinical benefit for mCRPC patients who progress on enzalutamide
Radiohybrid PSMA PET imaging has favourable detection rate for prostate cancer recurrence
PSMA PET is a predictive biomarker in mCRPC progressing after docetaxel
Artificial intelligence improves prediction of long-term outcomes
Significant tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer
Addition of abiraterone to ADT/docetaxel does not increase bone loss
Bavdegalutamide, a novel androgen receptor degrader, demonstrates clinical activity
Urothelial Carcinoma
No benefit of olaparib in previously untreated, platinum-ineligible, metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Rucaparib maintenance therapy extends PFS in platinum-responsive metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Positive efficacy and safety of N-803 plus BCG infusion in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC
Adding lenvatinib to pembrolizumab does not improve survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Maintenance niraparib fails to improve PFS in advanced urothelial cancer
First-line avelumab shows clinical activity in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Favourable pathologic response rate with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Second-line nivolumab/ipilimumab boost improves ORR in metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Sacituzumab govitecan effective in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer
Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin promising in MIBC ineligible for cisplatin
Renal Cell Carcinoma
High-risk early RCC may benefit from neoadjuvant avelumab plus axitinib
DFS benefits with adjuvant pembrolizumab in RCC persist with longer follow-up
Biomarkers predict response to immune nivolumab (± ipilimumab) in advanced RCC
Combined nivolumab/axitinib treatment elicits good response in metastatic RCC
Folliculin mutations not associated with sporadic chromophobe RCC
Differential patterns of molecular alterations among sites of metastasis in RCC
Nivolumab monotherapy represents an alternative first-line treatment option for treatment-naïve mRCC
Penile & Testicular Cancer
HPV-positive and HPV-negative penile squamous cell carcinoma are molecularly distinct tumours
Atezolizumab does not improve survival in advanced penile cancer
Biomarkers to distinguish necrosis from teratoma before pcRPLND in testicular cancer
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com