Penile squamous cell carcinoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy with few treatments in the advanced setting and little success of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Around half of penile squamous cell carcinoma cases are linked to HPV infection. More insight into the landscape of somatic alterations and immune checkpoint inhibitor-related biomarkers in penile squamous cell carcinoma could establish signatures for HPV-dependent and HPV-independent oncogenesis. Therefore, Dr Bassel Nazha (Emory University, GA, USA) and colleagues retrospectively analysed data of 108 patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma [1].
Penile squamous cell carcinoma tumours were genetically and molecularly characterised using next-generation sequencing, PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), tumour mutational burden (TMB), and HPV16/18 status. Among the entire cohort (n=108), 86% of tumours were primary and 22% of tumours were metastatic. In the overall cohort, the most frequently detected mutations were TP53 (46%), CDKN2A (26%), PIK3CA (25%), TERT promoter (22%), KMT2C (16%), and NOTCH1 (14%). Overall, 51% of tumours were PD-L1-positive, 10.7% had high TMB, and 1.1% had dMMR/MSI-H.
Of the 108 tumours, 29 had HPV status tested (16 HPV-negative, HPV-positive). KMT2C mutations (33.3% vs 0%), CREBBP mutations (23% vs 0%), and FGF3 amplifications (30.8% vs 0%) were specific to HPV-positive tumours, while CDKN2A mutations (37.5% vs 0%) were exclusive to HPV-negative tumours. HPV-negative tumours also had a trend towards increased TP53 (62.5% vs 7.7%) and TERT promoter (76.9% vs 25%) alterations.
TMB-high status was exclusively found in the HPV-positive tumours (30.8% vs 0%), while PD-L1 and dMMR/MSI-H status were not statistically different between the 2 groups.
Based on these results, Dr Nazha concluded that “HPV-positive and HPV-negative penile squamous cell carcinoma are molecularly distinct tumours. In addition, penile squamous cell carcinomas harbour potentially targetable alterations; e.g. one third of patients in the cohort had alterations in the PIK3 pathway. The finding that TMB-high status was exclusive to patients with HPV-positive tumours requires confirmation in larger datasets and could be used for better patient stratification in immune checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials.”
- Nazha B, et al. Comprehensive genomic profiling of penile squamous cell carcinoma and impact of HPV status on immune-checkpoint inhibition-related biomarkers. Abstract 4, ASCO GU 2022, 17–19 February.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Atezolizumab does not improve survival in advanced penile cancer Next Article
Nivolumab monotherapy represents an alternative first-line treatment option for treatment-naïve mRCC »
« Atezolizumab does not improve survival in advanced penile cancer Next Article
Nivolumab monotherapy represents an alternative first-line treatment option for treatment-naïve mRCC »
Table of Contents: ASCO GU 2022
Featured articles
Prostate Cancer
First-line treatment with olaparib significantly improves PFS in mCRPC
First-line treatment with niraparib significantly improves PFS in HRR-mutated mCRPC
Darolutamide improves OS in mHSPC
Continued enzalutamide plus docetaxel offers clinical benefit for mCRPC patients who progress on enzalutamide
Radiohybrid PSMA PET imaging has favourable detection rate for prostate cancer recurrence
PSMA PET is a predictive biomarker in mCRPC progressing after docetaxel
Artificial intelligence improves prediction of long-term outcomes
Significant tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer
Addition of abiraterone to ADT/docetaxel does not increase bone loss
Bavdegalutamide, a novel androgen receptor degrader, demonstrates clinical activity
Urothelial Carcinoma
No benefit of olaparib in previously untreated, platinum-ineligible, metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Rucaparib maintenance therapy extends PFS in platinum-responsive metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Positive efficacy and safety of N-803 plus BCG infusion in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC
Adding lenvatinib to pembrolizumab does not improve survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Maintenance niraparib fails to improve PFS in advanced urothelial cancer
First-line avelumab shows clinical activity in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Favourable pathologic response rate with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Second-line nivolumab/ipilimumab boost improves ORR in metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Sacituzumab govitecan effective in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer
Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin promising in MIBC ineligible for cisplatin
Renal Cell Carcinoma
High-risk early RCC may benefit from neoadjuvant avelumab plus axitinib
DFS benefits with adjuvant pembrolizumab in RCC persist with longer follow-up
Biomarkers predict response to immune nivolumab (± ipilimumab) in advanced RCC
Combined nivolumab/axitinib treatment elicits good response in metastatic RCC
Folliculin mutations not associated with sporadic chromophobe RCC
Differential patterns of molecular alterations among sites of metastasis in RCC
Nivolumab monotherapy represents an alternative first-line treatment option for treatment-naïve mRCC
Penile & Testicular Cancer
HPV-positive and HPV-negative penile squamous cell carcinoma are molecularly distinct tumours
Atezolizumab does not improve survival in advanced penile cancer
Biomarkers to distinguish necrosis from teratoma before pcRPLND in testicular cancer
Related Articles
May 21, 2019
HPV and penile cancer
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com