Checkpoint inhibitors are standard therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer after platinum-based regimens, with limited long-term disease control [1]. Sacituzumab govitecan is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) antibody coupled with the topoisomerase-I inhibitor SN-38 [2]. In Cohort 1 of the phase 2 TROPHY-U-01 trial (NCT03547973), sacituzumab govitecan monotherapy demonstrated significant activity and manageable safety in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who progressed after prior platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor [3].
Cohort 3 of TROPHY-U-01 evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining sacituzumab govitecan with pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. A total of 41 patients were enrolled and treated with sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and the interim results were presented by Dr Petros Grivas (University of Washington, WA, USA) [4].
At a median follow-up of 5.8 month, ORR was 34% (2% complete response, 32% partial response). The clinical benefit rate was 61%. Median duration of response was not yet reached, and the median PFS was 5.5 months. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea, anaemia, neutropenia, and asthenia. Two patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events.
Dr Grivas concluded that “in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer patients, sacituzumab govitecan in combination with pembrolizumab demonstrated encouraging ORR and clinical benefit rate, with an overall manageable safety profile. The data support further evaluation of sacituzumab govitecan plus an immune checkpoint inhibitor in metastatic urothelial cancer.”
- Nadal R, et al. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;76:10–21.
- Goldenberg DM, et al. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020;20:871–885.
- Tagawa, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:2474–2485.
- Grivas P, et al. TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 3: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in combination with pembrolizumab (Pembro) in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who progressed after platinum (PLT)-based regimens. Abstract 434, ASCO GU 2022, 17–19 February.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin promising in MIBC ineligible for cisplatin Next Article
Second-line nivolumab/ipilimumab boost improves ORR in metastatic urothelial carcinoma »
« Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin promising in MIBC ineligible for cisplatin Next Article
Second-line nivolumab/ipilimumab boost improves ORR in metastatic urothelial carcinoma »
Table of Contents: ASCO GU 2022
Featured articles
Prostate Cancer
First-line treatment with olaparib significantly improves PFS in mCRPC
First-line treatment with niraparib significantly improves PFS in HRR-mutated mCRPC
Darolutamide improves OS in mHSPC
Continued enzalutamide plus docetaxel offers clinical benefit for mCRPC patients who progress on enzalutamide
Radiohybrid PSMA PET imaging has favourable detection rate for prostate cancer recurrence
PSMA PET is a predictive biomarker in mCRPC progressing after docetaxel
Artificial intelligence improves prediction of long-term outcomes
Significant tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer
Addition of abiraterone to ADT/docetaxel does not increase bone loss
Bavdegalutamide, a novel androgen receptor degrader, demonstrates clinical activity
Urothelial Carcinoma
No benefit of olaparib in previously untreated, platinum-ineligible, metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Rucaparib maintenance therapy extends PFS in platinum-responsive metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Positive efficacy and safety of N-803 plus BCG infusion in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC
Adding lenvatinib to pembrolizumab does not improve survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Maintenance niraparib fails to improve PFS in advanced urothelial cancer
First-line avelumab shows clinical activity in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Favourable pathologic response rate with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Second-line nivolumab/ipilimumab boost improves ORR in metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Sacituzumab govitecan effective in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer
Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin promising in MIBC ineligible for cisplatin
Renal Cell Carcinoma
High-risk early RCC may benefit from neoadjuvant avelumab plus axitinib
DFS benefits with adjuvant pembrolizumab in RCC persist with longer follow-up
Biomarkers predict response to immune nivolumab (± ipilimumab) in advanced RCC
Combined nivolumab/axitinib treatment elicits good response in metastatic RCC
Folliculin mutations not associated with sporadic chromophobe RCC
Differential patterns of molecular alterations among sites of metastasis in RCC
Nivolumab monotherapy represents an alternative first-line treatment option for treatment-naïve mRCC
Penile & Testicular Cancer
HPV-positive and HPV-negative penile squamous cell carcinoma are molecularly distinct tumours
Atezolizumab does not improve survival in advanced penile cancer
Biomarkers to distinguish necrosis from teratoma before pcRPLND in testicular cancer
Related Articles
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com