A combination of systemic therapy with TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors is an established standard of care for patients with metastatic RCC. Several trials with different combinations are currently ongoing. Dr Matthew Zibelman (Fox Chase Cancer Center, PA, USA) presented the first results of a phase 1/2 study (NCT03172754) investigating the safety and efficacy of the TKI axitinib combined with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab [1]. The trial was initiated before the results from various phase 3 studies of immune checkpoint inhibitor/TKI combinations were known.
In the phase 1 part, the recommended dose for axitinib was established at 5 mg twice daily. The phase 2 part of the trial included 2 parallel arms: treatment-naïve mRCC patients and previously treated mRCC patients. Dr Zibelman presented results from the treatment-naïve arm only, which included 44 participants. The primary endpoint of the study is objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
Using the IMDC risk group grading, 18 patients (40.9%) had a favourable risk, 22 patients (52.3%) had intermediate risk, and 3 patients (6.8%) had poor risk. At a median follow-up of 11.5 months, objective response rate was 59.5%, with 2.4% complete responders and 57.1% partial responders. Disease control rate was 97.6%. Median PFS was 16.4 months, and median OS was not reached (see Figure). OS rate was 87.1% at 12 months and 69.4% at 24 months.
Figure: Progression-free and overall survival of treatment-naïve patients [1]

Adverse event data was similar to published data for other immune checkpoint inhibitor/TKI combinations, with no grade 4-5 adverse events. Discontinuation of axitinib for adverse events occurred in 9 (20.5%) patients, and discontinuation of nivolumab in 8 (18.2%) patients.
Dr Zibelman concluded that “the combination of axitinib plus nivolumab for treatment-naïve patients with metastatic RCC demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable with available immune checkpoint inhibitor/TKI combinations.” He believes that it is unlikely to move to a phase 3 trial given the wealth of immune checkpoint inhibitor/TKI combinations already available in this setting.
- Zibelman MR, et al. A phase I/II study of nivolumab and axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Abstract 291, ASCO GU 2022, 17–19 February.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Folliculin mutations not associated with sporadic chromophobe RCC Next Article
Biomarkers predict response to immune nivolumab (± ipilimumab) in advanced RCC »
« Folliculin mutations not associated with sporadic chromophobe RCC Next Article
Biomarkers predict response to immune nivolumab (± ipilimumab) in advanced RCC »
Table of Contents: ASCO GU 2022
Featured articles
Prostate Cancer
First-line treatment with olaparib significantly improves PFS in mCRPC
First-line treatment with niraparib significantly improves PFS in HRR-mutated mCRPC
Darolutamide improves OS in mHSPC
Continued enzalutamide plus docetaxel offers clinical benefit for mCRPC patients who progress on enzalutamide
Radiohybrid PSMA PET imaging has favourable detection rate for prostate cancer recurrence
PSMA PET is a predictive biomarker in mCRPC progressing after docetaxel
Artificial intelligence improves prediction of long-term outcomes
Significant tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer
Addition of abiraterone to ADT/docetaxel does not increase bone loss
Bavdegalutamide, a novel androgen receptor degrader, demonstrates clinical activity
Urothelial Carcinoma
No benefit of olaparib in previously untreated, platinum-ineligible, metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Rucaparib maintenance therapy extends PFS in platinum-responsive metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Positive efficacy and safety of N-803 plus BCG infusion in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC
Adding lenvatinib to pembrolizumab does not improve survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Maintenance niraparib fails to improve PFS in advanced urothelial cancer
First-line avelumab shows clinical activity in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Favourable pathologic response rate with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Second-line nivolumab/ipilimumab boost improves ORR in metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Sacituzumab govitecan effective in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer
Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin promising in MIBC ineligible for cisplatin
Renal Cell Carcinoma
High-risk early RCC may benefit from neoadjuvant avelumab plus axitinib
DFS benefits with adjuvant pembrolizumab in RCC persist with longer follow-up
Biomarkers predict response to immune nivolumab (± ipilimumab) in advanced RCC
Combined nivolumab/axitinib treatment elicits good response in metastatic RCC
Folliculin mutations not associated with sporadic chromophobe RCC
Differential patterns of molecular alterations among sites of metastasis in RCC
Nivolumab monotherapy represents an alternative first-line treatment option for treatment-naïve mRCC
Penile & Testicular Cancer
HPV-positive and HPV-negative penile squamous cell carcinoma are molecularly distinct tumours
Atezolizumab does not improve survival in advanced penile cancer
Biomarkers to distinguish necrosis from teratoma before pcRPLND in testicular cancer
Related Articles
January 24, 2022
AI can identify, grade prostate cancer like a pathologist
February 10, 2021
MRI-targeted biopsy may be of added value in prostate-cancer detection
February 24, 2021
MRI-based test promising for mass prostate-cancer screening
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com