Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is a rare but deadly disease; 5-year cancer-specific mortality rates for T2–T4 disease ranges from 21% to 59%. Irrespective of stage, patients with high-grade disease have a significantly worse prognosis [1]. Previously, the POUT trial (NCT01993979) demonstrated that adjuvant gemcitabine-platinum chemotherapy improves disease-free survival in patients with advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma [2]. In addition, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has proven survival benefits for invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, yet its role in upper tract urothelial carcinoma remains undefined.
The current multicentre, prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study (NCT01261728) evaluated neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma. A total of 57 patients received up to 4 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin prior to surgical resection and lymph node dissection; 40 participants (70%) tolerated all 4 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin, and all participants proceeded to surgery. The primary study endpoint was pathologic response rate (defined as <pT2N0). Dr Wesley Yip (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA) presented the results [3].
Among 57 patients evaluated, 36 (63%) demonstrated pathologic response, meeting the primary endpoint of the study. A complete response was noted in 11 patients (19%), defined as pT0N0. With a median follow-up of 3.1 years among survivors, 2- and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 78% and 65%; 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 93% and 79%. Participants demonstrating pathologic response had improved PFS and OS compared with those who did not (2-year PFS 91% vs 52%, P<0.001; 2-year OS 100% vs 80%, P<0.001). Overall, the chemotherapy was well tolerated.
“The results show a favourable pathologic response rate with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma and this might be considered a new standard of care option for these patients,” concluded Dr Yip.
- Olgac S, et al. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:1545–1552.
- Britle A, et al. Lancet. 2020;395:1268–1277.
- Yip W, et al. Final results of a multicenter prospective phase II clinical trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Abstract 440, ASCO GU 2022, 17–19 February.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Second-line nivolumab/ipilimumab boost improves ORR in metastatic urothelial carcinoma Next Article
First-line avelumab shows clinical activity in advanced urothelial carcinoma »
« Second-line nivolumab/ipilimumab boost improves ORR in metastatic urothelial carcinoma Next Article
First-line avelumab shows clinical activity in advanced urothelial carcinoma »
Table of Contents: ASCO GU 2022
Featured articles
Prostate Cancer
First-line treatment with olaparib significantly improves PFS in mCRPC
First-line treatment with niraparib significantly improves PFS in HRR-mutated mCRPC
Darolutamide improves OS in mHSPC
Continued enzalutamide plus docetaxel offers clinical benefit for mCRPC patients who progress on enzalutamide
Radiohybrid PSMA PET imaging has favourable detection rate for prostate cancer recurrence
PSMA PET is a predictive biomarker in mCRPC progressing after docetaxel
Artificial intelligence improves prediction of long-term outcomes
Significant tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer
Addition of abiraterone to ADT/docetaxel does not increase bone loss
Bavdegalutamide, a novel androgen receptor degrader, demonstrates clinical activity
Urothelial Carcinoma
No benefit of olaparib in previously untreated, platinum-ineligible, metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Rucaparib maintenance therapy extends PFS in platinum-responsive metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Positive efficacy and safety of N-803 plus BCG infusion in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC
Adding lenvatinib to pembrolizumab does not improve survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Maintenance niraparib fails to improve PFS in advanced urothelial cancer
First-line avelumab shows clinical activity in advanced urothelial carcinoma
Favourable pathologic response rate with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Second-line nivolumab/ipilimumab boost improves ORR in metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Sacituzumab govitecan effective in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer
Neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin promising in MIBC ineligible for cisplatin
Renal Cell Carcinoma
High-risk early RCC may benefit from neoadjuvant avelumab plus axitinib
DFS benefits with adjuvant pembrolizumab in RCC persist with longer follow-up
Biomarkers predict response to immune nivolumab (± ipilimumab) in advanced RCC
Combined nivolumab/axitinib treatment elicits good response in metastatic RCC
Folliculin mutations not associated with sporadic chromophobe RCC
Differential patterns of molecular alterations among sites of metastasis in RCC
Nivolumab monotherapy represents an alternative first-line treatment option for treatment-naïve mRCC
Penile & Testicular Cancer
HPV-positive and HPV-negative penile squamous cell carcinoma are molecularly distinct tumours
Atezolizumab does not improve survival in advanced penile cancer
Biomarkers to distinguish necrosis from teratoma before pcRPLND in testicular cancer
Related Articles
May 21, 2019
Radioguided surgery is the future?
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com