Which patient with biochemical recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer would result in a positive 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT? The 2019 EAU Guideline panel recommends performing 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT if the PSA level is >0.2 ng/mL, providing the results will influence treatment decisions, but it is unclear if this is cost-effective. Dr Lorenzo Bianchi (University of Bologna, Italy) built a prediction model to assess the risk of individual patients to have a positive PET/CT. Prostate cancer patients (n=703) with confirmed biochemical recurrence were stratified according to different clinical settings of recurrence: first PSA relapse (detection rate 40%), biochemical relapse after salvage therapy (detection rate 54%), PSA persistence after primary therapy (detection rate 60%), and disease progression before starting systemic therapies (detection rate 87%). The prediction model thus showed some promise, but will need to learn from this validation process in order to achieve better detection.
Dr Carlo Andrea Bravi et al. (Ospedale San Raffaele, Italy) reported a multicentre study looking at 605 patients treated with salvage lymph node dissection (SLND) for nodal recurrence of prostate cancer at 11 tertiary referral centres between 2002-2018. Outcomes were biochemical recurrence, clinical recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific and other-cause mortality at 8, 10, and 12 years from SLND. The long-term outcomes of these patients are not good; at 10 years post-SLND follow-up, only 15% of patients were free of clinical recurrence; cancer-specific mortality at 10 years was 34%. In a multivariate analysis of these data it became evident that the patients in this study that had a better outcome had been treated with concomitant hormonal/androgen deprivation therapy or a combination of concomitant hormonal therapy plus radiation therapy. This data points to the hypothesis that the combination treatment leads to the best outcomes, not the SLND alone.
Posted on
Previous Article
« FGFR3 gene mutation: Favourable prognostic impact in bladder cancer Next Article
The role of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: Extended vs standard »
« FGFR3 gene mutation: Favourable prognostic impact in bladder cancer Next Article
The role of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: Extended vs standard »
Table of Contents: EAU 2019
Featured articles
Prostate Cancer
Barentsz Trial – Bi-parametric MRI versus multi-parametric MRI
Enzalutamide plus ADT improves outcomes for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Prostate cancer active surveillance: Better patient risk stratification and use of imaging
The role of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: Extended vs standard
When to use imaging and imaging-guided therapies
Radioguided surgery is the future?
Bladder Cancer
Largest safety study of its kind with atezolizumab in metastatic bladder cancer
Bladder cancer risk and early detection
Consensus treatment pathway for patients with limited pelvic lymph node involvement in otherwise localised bladder cancer
FGFR3 gene mutation: Favourable prognostic impact in bladder cancer
Bladder cancer in young patients
Spanish study directly links surgical volume with mortality in bladder cancer patients undergoing cystectomy
Updated interim results of phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab for high-risk NMIBC unresponsive to BCG
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy or open radical cystectomy?
Renal Transplantation and Renal Cell Carcinoma
Andrology
Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE)
Male infertility/Premature ejaculation
Testosterone replacement therapy: Safe and maybe even protective
Focus on treatment of erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease
Penile prosthesis implantation
Functional Urology
Decision aids are too difficult for patients
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
The Urodynamics for Prostate Surgery Trial
Minimally invasive surgical techniques must compete against pharmacotherapy in benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH)
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com