https://doi.org/10.55788/49a646b8
In the True North trial (NCT02435992), treatment with the selective, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator ozanimod demonstrated significant improvements regarding the incidence of clinical remission and key secondary clinical, endoscopic, and histologic endpoints among patients with UC [1]. These endpoints were assessed after 10 weeks, at the end of the double-blind induction period, and after 52 weeks of treatment, at the end of the maintenance period [1]. Dr Anita Afzali (University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH, USA) presented a post-hoc analysis from the True North open-label extension (OLE) study, to assess recapture of response in patients who lost response while receiving placebo during the True North maintenance period and subsequently received ozanimod in the OLE [2].
In the True North study, participants were randomised 2:1 to receive double-blind ozanimod 0.92 mg or placebo (cohort 1) or open-label ozanimod 0.92 mg (cohort 2). Participants who achieved clinical response with ozanimod at the end of the induction period at 10 weeks (n=457) were re-randomised to placebo during the maintenance period of 42 weeks (n=227). Those who experienced disease relapse after discontinuing the treatment (n=77) subsequently received open-label re-induction with ozanimod.
Compared with all ozanimod-treated participant groups at induction baseline (cohort 1 and 2), a higher proportion of participants who lost response on placebo during the maintenance period were receiving corticosteroids at screening (41.6% vs 30.5% for cohort 1 and 36.2% for cohort 2) and had a history of prior biologic use (49.4% vs 32.4% for cohort 1 and 43.9% for cohort 2). More than half of the patients in this subgroup (56%; 43/77) achieved symptomatic clinical response within 5 weeks of re-initiating open-label ozanimod and maintained it until 10 weeks of the OLE (58%; 45/77). The response rates were similar in biologic-naïve participants and participants with prior biologic exposure. The mean partial Mayo score and subscores (rectal bleeding, stool frequency subscore, and Physician’s Global Assessment) decreased 5 weeks after the reintroduction, and further reductions occurred at week 10 of the OLE.
The authors concluded that almost 60% of participants who relapsed after ozanimod withdrawal during True North’s randomised maintenance period recaptured symptomatic clinical response by 10 weeks after ozanimod re-initiation. Furthermore, most of them presented these responses as early as 5 weeks after re-initiation.
- Sandborn WJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1280–91.
- Afzali A, et al. Recapture of response with ozanimod in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who withdrew therapy: data from the True North open-label extension study. MP248, UEG Week 2022, 8–11 October, Vienna, Austria.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Ozanimod treatment prompted substantial response after failure of response to induction Next Article
Neoplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus: the earlier the intervention, the better the long-term outcome »
« Ozanimod treatment prompted substantial response after failure of response to induction Next Article
Neoplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus: the earlier the intervention, the better the long-term outcome »
Table of Contents: UEGW 2022
Featured articles
IBD in 2022
Fast recapture of response with ozanimod after withdrawal in UC
Ozanimod treatment prompted substantial response after failure of response to induction
Etrasimod shows advantage over placebo in UC
Etrasimod reduces adaptive immune cells in the periphery in UC
Favourable maintenance rates for risankizumab also in delayed responders with CD
IL-23 inhibition reduces inflammatory biomarkers in pre-treated UC
Maintained symptom control with mirikizumab in UC
Mirikizumab successfully resolves active histologic inflammation in UC
Upadacitinib for CD: remarkable efficacy in induction therapy
Sustained maintenance results with upadacitinib in UC
Another chance for TYK2 inhibition in UC
Small molecule obefazimod shows promise in UC
Pivotal results of etrolizumab for CD partly disappointing
Better results for vedolizumab in early CD
Some patients with limited CD may benefit from an early surgical intervention
Dose-interval of adalimumab might be prolonged in CD patients in stable remission
What Is Hot in Upper GI Disorders?
Less ulcer bleeds early after H. pylori eradication in aspirin users
Dupilumab effective in paediatric patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis
Neoplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus: the earlier the intervention, the better the long-term outcome
Hepatology in 2022
Favourable pancreatitis outcomes with procalcitonin-based algorithm to guide antibiotic use
Portal hypertension is associated with poor prognosis in cirrhotic patients
Chances of transplant-free survival in PSC enhanced by colectomy with ileostomy
SARS-CoV-2: Booster doses of key importance for cirrhotic patients
What Is New in Pancreatic Cancer and Pancreatitis?
Fewer long-term interventions after delayed drainage in necrotising pancreatitis
Detection of Europe´s deadliest cancer: much room for improvement
Colorectal Carcinoma: Improving Diagnosis and Therapy
Immunotherapy response may be modulated by microbiome
Computer-aided colonoscopies improved adenoma detection rates
Screening-detected colorectal cancers may have superior surgical outcomes
Related Articles
March 17, 2023
First-line NALIRIFOX superior to standard treatment in mPDAC
November 24, 2021
Belzutifan shows benefit in two conditions that spark tumor growth
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com