Home > Gastroenterology > UEGW 2022 > IBD in 2022 > Fast recapture of response with ozanimod after withdrawal in UC

Fast recapture of response with ozanimod after withdrawal in UC

Presented by
Dr Anita Afzali, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH, USA
Conference
UEGW 2022
Trial
Phase 3, True North
Doi
https://doi.org/10.55788/49a646b8
Post-hoc analysis of the True North trial, in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) who relapsed after withdrawal of ozanimod during the maintenance period, investigated their response after re-introduction of the medication. Almost 60% of these patients recaptured clinical response within 10 weeks of re-initiation. 

In the True North trial (NCT02435992), treatment with the selective, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator ozanimod demonstrated significant improvements regarding the incidence of clinical remission and key secondary clinical, endoscopic, and histologic endpoints among patients with UC [1]. These endpoints were assessed after 10 weeks, at the end of the double-blind induction period, and after 52 weeks of treatment, at the end of the maintenance period [1]. Dr Anita Afzali (University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH, USA) presented a post-hoc analysis from the True North open-label extension (OLE) study, to assess recapture of response in patients who lost response while receiving placebo during the True North maintenance period and subsequently received ozanimod in the OLE [2].

In the True North study, participants were randomised 2:1 to receive double-blind ozanimod 0.92 mg or placebo (cohort 1) or open-label ozanimod 0.92 mg (cohort 2). Participants who achieved clinical response with ozanimod at the end of the induction period at 10 weeks (n=457) were re-randomised to placebo during the maintenance period of 42 weeks (n=227). Those who experienced disease relapse after discontinuing the treatment (n=77) subsequently received open-label re-induction with ozanimod.

Compared with all ozanimod-treated participant groups at induction baseline (cohort 1 and 2), a higher proportion of participants who lost response on placebo during the maintenance period were receiving corticosteroids at screening (41.6% vs 30.5% for cohort 1 and 36.2% for cohort 2) and had a history of prior biologic use (49.4% vs 32.4% for cohort 1 and 43.9% for cohort 2). More than half of the patients in this subgroup (56%; 43/77) achieved symptomatic clinical response within 5 weeks of re-initiating open-label ozanimod and maintained it until 10 weeks of the OLE (58%; 45/77). The response rates were similar in biologic-naïve participants and participants with prior biologic exposure. The mean partial Mayo score and subscores (rectal bleeding, stool frequency subscore, and Physician’s Global Assessment) decreased 5 weeks after the reintroduction, and further reductions occurred at week 10 of the OLE.

The authors concluded that almost 60% of participants who relapsed after ozanimod withdrawal during True North’s randomised maintenance period recaptured symptomatic clinical response by 10 weeks after ozanimod re-initiation. Furthermore, most of them presented these responses as early as 5 weeks after re-initiation.

  1. Sandborn WJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1280–91.
  2. Afzali A, et al. Recapture of response with ozanimod in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who withdrew therapy: data from the True North open-label extension study. MP248, UEG Week 2022, 8–11 October, Vienna, Austria.




Posted on