Prof. William Schuyler Jones (Duke Clinical Research Institute, NC, USA) presented the ADAPTABLE study (NCT02697916), which aimed to compare the effectiveness of 2 doses of aspirin at preventing major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with ASCVD (defined as a history of prior MI, prior coronary angiography showing ≥75% stenosis of at least 1 epicardial coronary vessel or prior coronary revascularisation procedures, or history of chronic heart disease).
The ADAPTABLE trial was a pragmatic, open-label, patient-centred, randomised clinical trial conducted in 15,076 patients with ASCVD within the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet). Participants (n=15,067) were assigned to take either 325 mg of aspirin daily (n=7,536) or 81 mg of aspirin daily (n=7,540). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, hospitalisation for MI, or hospitalisation for stroke.
After a median follow-up of 26.2 months, 590 (7.28%) participants in the 81 mg dosage arm and 569 (7.51%) participants in the 325 mg dosage arm had reached the primary endpoint (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.91–1.14). The primary safety endpoint was hospitalisation for major bleeding. Less than 1% of the participants in either group experienced a significant bleed (53 or 0.63% in the 81 mg daily dose group and 44 or 0.60% in the 325 mg daily dose group). Participants could switch their dose of aspirin during the study if they chose to do so. Among the lower dose group, 7.1% of patients chose to switch to the higher dosage, while among the higher dose group, 41.6% chose to switch to the lower dose.
The researchers concluded that there were no observed differences in cardiovascular events or major bleeding between higher and lower dose of aspirin in patients with ASCVD. These findings stand in contrast to prior randomised trials in ACS (e.g. OASIS-7), which observed higher bleeding rates with high versus low dose aspirin. In this context, the high rate of cross over, particularly from higher to lower dose treatment, is an important limitation of the study.
- Jones WS. Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits And Long-term Effectiveness Trial (ADAPTABLE). ACC 2021 Scientific Session, 15–17 May.
- Jones WS, et al. N Engl J Med 2021;384:1981-1990.
Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Etripamil nasal spray significantly improves PSVT-related symptoms Next Article
Apixaban outcomes similar to current standard of care following TAVR »
« Etripamil nasal spray significantly improves PSVT-related symptoms Next Article
Apixaban outcomes similar to current standard of care following TAVR »
Table of Contents: ACC 2021
Featured articles
Electrophysiology
Favourable outcomes with transcatheter atrial appendage occlusion
Etripamil nasal spray significantly improves PSVT-related symptoms
Ablation-based rhythm control as effective as rate control in AF and HF
Finerenone reduces the risk of AF onset in patients with CKD and diabetes
Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathy
PARADISE-MI: Sacubitril/valsartan not superior to ramipril in reducing HF events
Older adults with heart failure benefit from rehabilitation programme
Quality improvement intervention fails to improve care for patients with heart failure
Sacubitril/valsartan does not reduce NT-proBNP versus valsartan alone in HFrEF
Novel use of ivabradine in reversible cardiomyopathy
Mavacamten significantly improves QoL of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Interventional and Structural Cardiology
Men and women benefit equally from early aspirin withdrawal following PCI
Similar outcomes with fractional flow reserve and angiography-guided revascularisation
TALOS-AMI: Exploring outcomes after switching to clopidogrel versus ticagrelor at 1 month from MI
Clopidogrel monotherapy associated with better net outcomes relative to aspirin monotherapy 6-18 months after PCI
Ischaemic Heart Disease
No difference in ischaemic risk or bleeding with low vs high-dose aspirin for secondary prevention: Lessons and questions from the ADAPTABLE trial
Rivaroxaban reduces total ischaemic events after peripheral artery revascularisation
Moderate hypothermia not superior to mild hypothermia following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Better outcomes with invasive strategy if anatomic complete revascularisation is possible
Prevention and Health Promotion
STRENGTH trial fails to demonstrate cardioprotective effect of omega-3 fatty acids
Evinacumab lowers triglyceride levels in severe hypertriglyceridaemia
Health equity and the role of the cardiologist: 7 priorities to consider
COVID-19
Dapagliflozin fails to show a significant protective effect in COVID-19
Therapeutic anticoagulation not superior to prophylactic anticoagulation in COVID-19
Atorvastatin does not reduce mortality in COVID-19
Valvular Heart Disease
Apixaban outcomes similar to current standard of care following TAVR
Preliminary results encouraging for EVOQUE tricuspid valve replacement
Related Articles
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy