https://doi.org/10.55788/fe2328c0
Part 1 of the CheckMate 227 trial (NCT02477826) randomised 1,189 patients with metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 expression levels ≥1% 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab alone, or platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Part 2 randomised 550 patients with this condition but with PD-L1 expression levels <1% to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone. Previous analyses of this trial showed that patients on nivolumab plus ipilimumab had higher overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates than patients on chemotherapy [1]. Prof. Julie Brahmer (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Australia) presented the 5-year update of CheckMate 227 [2].
In the subgroup of patients with PD-L1 expression levels ≥1%, 24% of the patients on the immunotherapy combination were alive compared with 14% in the chemotherapy arm (median OS 17.1 vs 14.9 months; HR 0.77). After 5 years, 12% of the patients in the immunotherapy combination arm were still progression-free, but only 2% in the chemotherapy arm. Moreover, 28% of the patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm had an ongoing response, even though the study drug had been discontinued for ≥3 years, and this was only 3% in the chemotherapy arm.
In the stratum of patients that had PD-L1 expression levels <1%, the OS rates after 5 years were 19% and 7%, favouring the combination therapy arm over the chemotherapy arm (HR 0.65). The PFS rates (12% vs 2%) and duration of response rates (21% vs not applicable) after 5 years demonstrated a similar benefit in the combination arm as was seen in the PD-L1 ≥1% subgroup of patients. Interestingly, in 5-year survivors treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, the quality-of-life scores were at or above the US norms for up to 4.5 years, irrespective of PD-L1 expression level.
- Hellman MD, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):2020–2031.
- Brahmer JR, et al. Five-year survival outcomes with nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) versus chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from CheckMate 227. LBA9025, ASCO Annual Meeting, 3–7 June, Chicago, IL, USA.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Effect of KRAS mutations and PD-L1 expression on therapy response in non-small cell lung cancer Next Article
Adagrasib safe and clinically active in non-small cell lung cancer »
« Effect of KRAS mutations and PD-L1 expression on therapy response in non-small cell lung cancer Next Article
Adagrasib safe and clinically active in non-small cell lung cancer »
Table of Contents: ASCO 2022
Featured articles
Breast Cancer
Sacituzumab govitecan meets primary endpoint
Shaky OS results of palbociclib in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer
Practice-changing results of T-DXd in HER2-low breast cancer
SET2,3 to inform on chemotherapy decisions in ER-positive breast cancer
Metastasis-directed therapy fails in oligometastatic breast cancer
Analysis by residual cancer burden further clarifies effect of pembrolizumab
Contribution of metastatic therapies on mortality reduction in breast cancer
Radiotherapy may be omitted in breast cancer patients
Promising data for ribociclib after progression on ET plus CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
7-gene biosignature: Benefits of endocrine therapy and radiotherapy in breast cancer risk groups
Lung Cancer
Additional tiragolumab does not help patients with untreated small cell lung cancer
Success for serplulimab plus chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer
Adagrasib safe and clinically active in non-small cell lung cancer
Long-term benefits of combined immunotherapy over chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Effect of KRAS mutations and PD-L1 expression on therapy response in non-small cell lung cancer
Melanoma
First results on distant metastasis-free survival in stage II melanoma
Higher response rates for concurrent triple therapy versus sequential therapy in melanoma
Genitourinary Cancers
Exploratory treatment options fail in ccRCC
Adjuvant everolimus did not benefit high-risk renal cell carcinoma
Cabozantinib fails as first-line maintenance therapy in urothelial cancer
177Lu-PSMA-617 is a valid treatment option for PSMA-positive mCRPC
Enzalutamide performs well in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Haematologic Malignancies
Autologous stem cell transplantation plus RVd improves PFS in multiple myeloma
Novel first-line treatment option for mantle cell lymphoma
Promising results for novel CAR-T therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
Gastrointestinal Cancers
Panitumumab beats bevacizumab in RAS wildtype left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer
Spectacular results for dostarlimab in mismatch repair deficient rectal cancer
Triplet chemotherapy beats doublet chemotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastases
To resect or not to resect primary tumours in stage IV colon cancer?
Novel treatment option for KRAS wildtype pancreatic cancer
Gynaecological Cancers
Primary results of rucaparib in ovarian cancer
Trabectedin not superior to chemotherapy in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
Encouraging results of relacorilant in ovarian cancer
Miscellaneous Topics
Bacterial decolonisation effective against radiation dermatitis
New standard-of-care for cisplatin-ineligible locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Ifosfamide is likely to be the go-to therapy in recurrent Ewing sarcoma
Dabrafenib plus trametinib candidates for standard-of-care in BRAF V600-mutated paediatric low-grade glioma
Related Articles
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com