https://doi.org/10.55788/577253ee
The risk of recurrence is substantial in patients with stage IIB or IIC melanoma [1]. The phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 trial (NCT03553836) randomised 976 patients with resected, high-risk, stage II melanoma 1:1 to pembrolizumab or placebo. Previous results from this trial showed that treatment with adjuvant pembrolizumab improved the recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared with placebo treatment (HR 0.65; P=0.0066) [2]. Prof. Georgina Long (The University of Sydney, Australia) presented the first findings of DMFS from the KEYNOTE-716 trial [3].
After a median follow-up of 27.4 months, the DMFS rate was improved in patients receiving pembrolizumab compared with patients receiving placebo (HR 0.64; P=0.0029; see Figure). Distant metastasis was detected in 12.9% and in 19.4% of the patients in the pembrolizumab arm and placebo arm, respectively. The median DMFS was not reached in either treatment groups. Moreover, the results were consistent across T-subcategories and other key subgroups. This interim analysis showed that RFS continued to favour the pembrolizumab arm over the placebo arm (HR 0.64).
Figure: Distant metastasis-free survival curves for pembrolizumab versus placebo [3]
NR, not reached; mo, month; Prembro, pembrolizumab.
No new safety issues emerged from the current analysis. In total, 17% and 5% of the patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) in the pembrolizumab and placebo group, respectively. In addition, 16% of the patients discontinued pembrolizumab due to AEs compared with 2% in the placebo group. Pruritus, rash, and diarrhoea were the most common grade ≥3 events in the experimental arm.
Dr Charlotte Ariyan (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA) argued that the risk of recurrence is approximately 40% in stage II patients and that the absolute risk reduction of these patients is 8% if they are treated with pembrolizumab. “Since the rate of grade ≥3 events is 17% and effective post-progression systemic therapies are available for these patients, the overall survival between patients who receive pembrolizumab or systemic therapies may be similar. We should improve the risk estimation of our patients by adding personalised risk calculators, genomic prediction models, and minimal residual disease values to the equation, to calculate which patients would benefit from what treatment.”
- Egger ME, et al. Surgery. 2016;159(5):1412‒1421.
- Luke JJ, et al. Lancet. 2022;399:1718‒1729.
- Long GV, et al. Distantmetastasis-free survival withpembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvanttherapy in stage IIB or IIC melanoma: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 study. LBA9500, ASCO 2022 Annual Meeting, 3–7 June, Chicago, IL, USA.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Higher response rates for concurrent triple therapy versus sequential therapy in melanoma Next Article
Enzalutamide performs well in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer »
« Higher response rates for concurrent triple therapy versus sequential therapy in melanoma Next Article
Enzalutamide performs well in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer »
Table of Contents: ASCO 2022
Featured articles
Breast Cancer
Sacituzumab govitecan meets primary endpoint
Shaky OS results of palbociclib in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer
Practice-changing results of T-DXd in HER2-low breast cancer
SET2,3 to inform on chemotherapy decisions in ER-positive breast cancer
Metastasis-directed therapy fails in oligometastatic breast cancer
Analysis by residual cancer burden further clarifies effect of pembrolizumab
Contribution of metastatic therapies on mortality reduction in breast cancer
Radiotherapy may be omitted in breast cancer patients
Promising data for ribociclib after progression on ET plus CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
7-gene biosignature: Benefits of endocrine therapy and radiotherapy in breast cancer risk groups
Lung Cancer
Additional tiragolumab does not help patients with untreated small cell lung cancer
Success for serplulimab plus chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer
Adagrasib safe and clinically active in non-small cell lung cancer
Long-term benefits of combined immunotherapy over chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Effect of KRAS mutations and PD-L1 expression on therapy response in non-small cell lung cancer
Melanoma
First results on distant metastasis-free survival in stage II melanoma
Higher response rates for concurrent triple therapy versus sequential therapy in melanoma
Genitourinary Cancers
Exploratory treatment options fail in ccRCC
Adjuvant everolimus did not benefit high-risk renal cell carcinoma
Cabozantinib fails as first-line maintenance therapy in urothelial cancer
177Lu-PSMA-617 is a valid treatment option for PSMA-positive mCRPC
Enzalutamide performs well in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Haematologic Malignancies
Autologous stem cell transplantation plus RVd improves PFS in multiple myeloma
Novel first-line treatment option for mantle cell lymphoma
Promising results for novel CAR-T therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
Gastrointestinal Cancers
Panitumumab beats bevacizumab in RAS wildtype left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer
Spectacular results for dostarlimab in mismatch repair deficient rectal cancer
Triplet chemotherapy beats doublet chemotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastases
To resect or not to resect primary tumours in stage IV colon cancer?
Novel treatment option for KRAS wildtype pancreatic cancer
Gynaecological Cancers
Primary results of rucaparib in ovarian cancer
Trabectedin not superior to chemotherapy in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
Encouraging results of relacorilant in ovarian cancer
Miscellaneous Topics
Bacterial decolonisation effective against radiation dermatitis
New standard-of-care for cisplatin-ineligible locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Ifosfamide is likely to be the go-to therapy in recurrent Ewing sarcoma
Dabrafenib plus trametinib candidates for standard-of-care in BRAF V600-mutated paediatric low-grade glioma
Related Articles
August 5, 2022
Letter from the Editor
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com