ARAMIS was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial in men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and a PSADT of ≤10 months. Participants (n=1,509) received darolutamide or placebo while continuing androgen-deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint of metastasis-free survival was met [2]; moreover, with a median follow-up of 29 months, the ARAMIS final analysis reported that all key secondary endpoints were met as well [3]. A PSADT of ≤10 months was used to define patients at high risk for metastatic progression, which is associated with lower survival [4]. The current subgroup analysis assessed whether the PSADT value predicts response or safety signals of darolutamide.
To this end, the researchers grouped the trial arms into a presumably lower-risk category of PSADT >6-10 months (darolutamide n=286; placebo n=183), and higher-risk patients with PSADT ≤6 months (darolutamide n=669; placebo n = 371). Darolutamide reduced the risk of metastasis and death by 59% in the PSADT ≤6 months subgroup (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.33-0.52) and 62% in the >6-10 months subgroup (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.26-0.55), respectively, indicating equal efficacy across PSADTs [1]. Similarly, the safety profile of darolutamide was consistent across patients with PSADT >6-10 months and ≤6 months. Both groups showed a low incidence of adverse events (AEs) grade ≥3. The most frequently reported AEs in both subgroups were fatigue, back pain, and arthralgia. Minimal or no differences were observed in AEs characteristic for androgen receptor inhibitor treatment, such as falls, hypertension, and central nervous system-related events between darolutamide and placebo in both subgroups.
These results indicate that nmCRPC patients with PSADT >6-10 months can benefit from darolutamide without increased safety risks.
- Bögemann M, et al. EAU20 Virtual Congress, 17-26 July 2020, Abstract 919.
- Fizazi K, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(13):1235-1246.
- Fizazi K, et al. ASCO Virtual Meeting, 29-31 May 2020, Abstract 5514.
- Smith MR, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(30):3800-3806.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Large patient-driven survey reveals QoL issues after prostate cancer treatment Next Article
Docetaxel + hormonal therapy: improved prostate cancer PFS »
« Large patient-driven survey reveals QoL issues after prostate cancer treatment Next Article
Docetaxel + hormonal therapy: improved prostate cancer PFS »
Table of Contents: EAU 2020
Featured articles
Surgical Techniques and Safety
The new adjustable artificial sphincter victo: Surgical technique and results after a follow-up of more than one year
New urosepsis data from the SERPENS study
Stones
Intra-operative cone-beam computed tomography for detecting residual stones in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Pressure and temperature: do high-power lasers pose a threat?
Radiation stewardship for patient and endourologist
New lithotripter data: improved stone clearance
Renal Cancer
Beyond the limits of ultrasound: Three dimensional augmented reality robot assisted partial nephrectomy (3D AR-RAPN) for complex renal masses
Imaging guided surgery with augmented reality for robotic partial nephrectomy
KEYNOTE-426: no QoL differences pembrolizumab + axitinib versus sunitinib
Debate: upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy or not?
Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: lower morbidity
Bladder Cancer
Reduced BCG frequency, faster NMIBC recurrence
Nadofaragene firadenovec effective in BCG-unresponsive papillary NMIBC
Understanding MIBC biology for novel treatment options
Prostate Cancer & Imaging
Transperineal laser ablation of prostate
Prostatectomy: R-LRPE better than LRPE for continence
PSMA PET-CT staging is 27% more accurate
Docetaxel + hormonal therapy: improved prostate cancer PFS
ARAMIS subgroup analysis: darolutamide benefits across PSADT groups
Large patient-driven survey reveals QoL issues after prostate cancer treatment
Targeting steroid sulphatase in resistant prostate cancer cells
Good tolerance of post-RP radiotherapy ± short-term ADT
BPH & LUTS
Minimizing post-operative stress urinary incontinence after HoLEP: Our preliminary experience and short-term results of ‘’En Bloc’’ technique with early apical release
LUTS 2-year outcomes: aquablation versus TURP
HoLEP versus PVP in prospective randomised trial
Testis Cancer & Andrology
Peyronie’s disease: surgical options
Infertility and testis cancer risk: causal or association?
32% more men complain of reduced sex drive in 2019 versus 2009
Related Articles
September 27, 2021
Serum biomarker of fibrosis may help predict diabetic kidney disease
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com