Home > Neurology > ECTRIMS 2019 > Pregnancy in the Treatment Era > The maternal perspective: when to stop/resume treatment and risks for progression

The maternal perspective: when to stop/resume treatment and risks for progression

Presented by
Dr Emilio Portaccio, University of Florence, Italy
Conference
ECTRIMS 2019
Trial
PRIMS
Over the last few decades, pregnancy decision-making in MS has become increasingly challenging, as mentioned by Dr Emilio Portaccio (University of Florence, Italy), “We have to deal with different disease- and patient-related factors”. In his talk, he focused on the treatment decisions in relation to maternal risks of progression during and after pregnancy.

To determine when to stop and when to resume MS treatment, it is important to consider the disease course during and after pregnancy. The European multicentric Pregnancy in Multiple Sclerosis (PRIMS) study, which was conducted in the period before the introduction of disease-modifying drugs (DMTs), clearly showed that disease activity reduced during the gestational period (P=0.03) and increased thereafter, particularly during the first trimester postpartum [1].

Since the publication of the PRIMS study, several DMTs have been introduced (Table). “With respect to disease course and maternal risk of progression during pregnancy, that risk is generally limited for the newer drugs”, Dr Portaccio said. “These drugs may be valuable as first-line therapies, particularly the injectables, and among the high-efficacy therapies, natalizumab.” Several studies showed that disease activity during and after pregnancy was reduced in patients receiving first-line therapies, in comparison with the observations in the previous PRIMS study. Therefore, early DMT resumption should be encouraged, particularly in patients with a more active disease [3].

Table. DMTs for the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS [2]

Postpartum period

The postpartum period is a critical phase in which disease reactivation is expected. “Treatment should be aimed to prevent disease reactivation”, Dr Portaccio advised. “We should take into account possible predictors of disease reactivation after delivery. The occurrence of relapses during pregnancy is found to be associated with a higher risk of disease reactivation after delivery. Interestingly, in the Italian pregnancy dataset [3], early restart of disease therapy after delivery reduced the risk of relapses after pregnancy.” However, it was also stated that disease activity after pregnancy is not limited to relapses. “Although the median disease activity (EDSS score) remains stable before and after pregnancy, at the individual level, 13% of patients were observed to have progression of disability after 1-year follow-up [3]. This progression was related to higher disease activity before pregnancy and the occurrence of relapses during the year before delivery.” However, published literature to-date reveals that more studies report no effect of pregnancy on MS disability than those reporting reduced disability or a delay in progression. One of the major limitations is the possibility of reverse causality, i.e. women with more aggressive disease may choose not to conceive due to concerns about their current symptoms, disability, or choice of treatment during pregnancy [4].

In conclusion, pregnancy should be planned after a period of clinical stability, i.e. no relapses in the year before conception. “Next, we should consider risk of postpartum disease activity: relapses before pregnancy, relapses during pregnancy, and higher disability level. Particularly in high risk women, continuation of therapy until conception or during gestational period and early restart of therapy after delivery are recommended.”

  1. Confavreux C, et al. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:285-91.
  2. Rotstein D, Montalban X. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15:287-300.
  3. Portaccio E, et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:845-50.
  4. Nguyen AL, et al. Autoimmun Rev. 2019;18:102360.




Posted on