Filgotinib is being investigated for several inflammatory conditions, including ulcerative colitis. The SELECTION maintenance study evaluated maintenance treatment with filgotinib in 664 patients with moderately- to severely-active ulcerative colitis who achieved clinical remission or Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) response after 10 weeks of induction with filgotinib 100 mg or 200 mg or placebo. Approximately 40% of patients were biologic-experienced. Patients randomised to filgotinib induction were re-randomised to their induction filgotinib dose or placebo. Patients randomised to placebo during induction continued placebo maintenance. Mandatory steroid tapering was required.
The primary endpoint was endoscopic/rectal bleeding/stool frequency (EBS) remission at week 58, defined by Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1, rectal bleeding subscore=0, and ≥1-point decrease in stool frequency subscore (SFS) from baseline and SFS ≤1. A significantly higher proportion of patients on filgotinib achieved EBS remission compared with placebo:
- 2% with placebo versus 37.2% with filgotinib 200 mg; and
- 5% with placebo versus 23.8% with filgotinib 100 mg.
In addition, significantly higher proportions of patients achieved key secondary endpoints, including 6-month corticosteroid-free clinical remission and histologic remission, with filgotinib 200 mg versus placebo:
- 6-month corticosteroid-free clinical remission: 5.1% with placebo versus 27.2% with filgotinib 200 mg;
- sustained clinical remission: 9.2% with placebo versus 18.1% with filgotinib 200 mg;
- MCS remission: 6.1% with placebo versus 34.7% with filgotinib 200 mg; and
- endoscopic remission: 13.3% with placebo versus 15.6% with filgotinib 200 mg;
Overall, the incidences of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs were similar across treatment arms. Serious infections and herpes zoster infections were infrequent across groups, and no opportunistic infections occurred. There were no venous thromboses, including pulmonary embolism, among filgotinib-treated patients.
The current analysis of the SELECTION study showed that filgotinib was effective as maintenance treatment for patients with moderately- to severely-active ulcerative colitis who had achieved clinical response to induction treatment with filgotinib. Moreover, filgotinib 200 mg met all key secondary endpoints including endoscopic, histologic, and 6-month corticosteroid-free remission.
- Peyrin-Biroulet L. Efficacy and safety of filgotinib as maintenance therapy for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results from the phase 2B/3 SELECTION study. UEG Week Virtual Symposium 2020, abstract LB20.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Possible causal link between eosinophilic inflammation and anxiety Next Article
No improvements of remission with etrolizumab in ulcerative colitis »
« Possible causal link between eosinophilic inflammation and anxiety Next Article
No improvements of remission with etrolizumab in ulcerative colitis »
Table of Contents: UEGW 2020
Featured articles
Risk factors for severe COVID-19 among IBD patients
UEGW Round-Up Articles
Sustained efficacy of mirikizumab in moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease
Low-FODMAPs diet does not improve PPI-refractory GERD
Probiotic provides a potential adjuvant treatment to gluten-free diet
Cholecystectomy does not affect mortality in elderly patients
No improvements of remission with etrolizumab in ulcerative colitis
Filgotinib effective as maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis
Possible causal link between eosinophilic inflammation and anxiety
Dupilumab improves in diverse aspects of eosinophilic oesophagitis
Plecanatide effective for IBS with constipation
Sustained response to faecal microbiota transplantation
Endoscopy can be delivered safely during the COVID-19 pandemic
Adenoma detection rate improves over time
Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers in IBD patients
Risk factors for severe COVID-19 among IBD patients
First randomised T2T trial using endoscopy to guide dose escalation
Related Articles
December 24, 2020
PPI therapy may render infliximab less effective in IBD patients
April 14, 2020
Pipeline of IBD drugs
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com