https://doi.org/10.55788/49b093ea
âCCM therapy has been demonstrated to be efficacious in patients with HF with reduced or mid-range ejection fractions,â mentioned Prof. Cecilia Linde (Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden) [1]. The current prospective, multicentre CCM-HFpEF pilot study (NCT03240237) aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CCM in patients with symptomatic HFpEF (n=47). The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) overall summary score through week 24 and the primary safety endpoint was the number of device-related and procedure-related complications.
After 24 weeks, CCM therapy was associated with a mean improvement of 18.0 points on the KCCQ overall summary score (P<0.001). Similarly, the mean change in KCCQ clinical summary score from baseline was 15.3 points (P<0.001). Left atrial volume index was decreased (48.2 mL/m2 vs 45.9 mL/m2; P=0.034), as was the septal E/eâ ratio (15.3 vs 14.5; P=0.038), and the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (2.6 vs 2.2; P<0.001). In addition, only 2 participants had experienced â„1 HF hospitalisation during the study (168 days) compared with 15 participants in the year before CCM was administered. As for safety, 3 procedure-related complications were reported in 3 participants and no device-related complications were observed after 24 weeks, resulting in an event-free rate of 93.6%.
âTo date, there has not been a device to improve the quality-of-life of patients with HFpEF,â commented Prof. Wilfried Mullens (Hospital Oost-Limburg, Belgium). âThe current study is important since it displayed an impressive improvement in the KCCQ score in patients with HFpEF who were treated with CCM. However, the results of this pivotal study need to be confirmed in large randomised trials.â
- Linde C, et al. CCMHFpEF: Is CCM Therapy safe and effective in patients with HFpEF? LBT Devices, Heart Failure 2022, 21â24 May, Madrid, Spain.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« REBALANCE-HF: Encouraging observations for splanchnic nerve ablation in HFpEF Next Article
Combination of filgrastim and dutogliptin appears safe in STEMI »
« REBALANCE-HF: Encouraging observations for splanchnic nerve ablation in HFpEF Next Article
Combination of filgrastim and dutogliptin appears safe in STEMI »
Table of Contents: HFA 2022
Featured articles
Phase 3 and 4 Trials
GALACTIC-HF: Omecamtiv mecarbil as option for HFrEF patients with low SBP
HELIOS-A: Vutrisiran meets exploratory endpoints
Patiromer helps HFrEF patients to optimise RAAS inhibitors without hyperkalaemia
FIDELITY: Cardiorenal benefits of finerenone, regardless of LVH status
DAPA-VO2: Rapid effect of dapagliflozin on peak VO2 in stable HFrEF
Phase 1/2 Trials
Significant improvement in BP from istaroxime, a novel non-adrenergic agent
SERENADE: Macitentan fails in HFpEF plus PAH
Combination of filgrastim and dutogliptin appears safe in STEMI
Therapeutic Devices
Cardiac contractility modulation therapy promising for patients with HFpEF
REBALANCE-HF: Encouraging observations for splanchnic nerve ablation in HFpEF
Updates on SGLT2 Inhibitors
DAPA-HF: Dapagliflozin is safe and efficacious in frail patients
EMPEROR-Preserved: Empagliflozin stable across age groups
EMPULSE: Empagliflozin delivers rapid and clinically meaningful decongestion
Dapagliflozin performs consistently across LVEF in HF
Miscellaneous Topics
Cardiac wasting relevant for clinical outcomes in cancer
Urocortin-2 a potential treatment target for HFpEF
Should ATTR-CM be added to the differential diagnosis of patients with HF?
Delayed initiation of novel GDMTs associated with adverse outcomes in HF patients
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com