https://doi.org/10.55788/6b5123e5
The randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 SELECT trial (NCT03574597) assessed the safety and efficacy of the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide, added to standard-of-care, in patients with pre-existing CVD and overweight or obesity but without diabetes [1]. The 17,604 participants were randomised 1:1 to 2.4 mg semaglutide (subcutaneously administered once weekly) or a placebo. Of note, the dosing of semaglutide was titrated, starting at a dose of 0.24 mg and increasing to the anticipated dose of 2.4 mg at week 16. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or non-fatal stroke, measured at week 48.
“Semaglutide met its primary endpoint in this trial,” expressed Dr Michael Lincoff (Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA) (see Figure). The event rate was 8.0% in the placebo arm and 6.5% in the semaglutide arm, with a corresponding hazard ratio of 0.80 (95% CI 0.72–0.90; P<0.001). Further, the primary outcome result was consistent across pre-defined subgroups.
Figure: Primary cardiovascular composite endpoint at 48 weeks [1]
The first confirmatory secondary endpoint of cardiovascular death was numerically but not significantly in favour of the semaglutide arm (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.71–1.01; P=0.065). The second and third confirmatory secondary endpoints, which were a heart failure composite and death from any cause, showed benefits for participants randomised to semaglutide over those randomised to placebo (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.71–0.96; HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.71–0.93).
Finally, no unexpected safety issues were encountered. The rate of gastrointestinal adverse events was higher in the semaglutide arm than in the placebo arm (10.0% vs 2.0%; P<0.001). However, the rates of serious gastrointestinal events were similar between the groups.
- Lincoff AM, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with overweight or obesity and cardiovascular disease who do not have diabetes: the SELECT trial. LB01, AHA Scientific Sessions 2023, 11–13 November, Philadelphia, USA.
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Can a walking intervention improve functional status and quality of life in HFrEF? Next Article
Letter from the Editor »
« Can a walking intervention improve functional status and quality of life in HFrEF? Next Article
Letter from the Editor »
Table of Contents: AHA 2023
Featured articles
Abelacimab substantially lowers bleeding risk compared with rivaroxaban
Hot Topics in CAD/PAD
MINT: Liberal or restrictive transfusion strategy in MI with anaemia?
ORBITA-2 confirms PCI effective for symptom relief in patients with stable angina
Nicotinamide riboside shows promising trend for walking function in PAD
Pemafibrate reduces microvascular complications of PAD and T2D
Dapagliflozin improves cardiometabolic outcomes in myocardial infarction
Optimising Hypertension Outcomes
Edoxaban versus warfarin in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Sodium intake and blood pressure: new insights
Post-partum intervention lowers BP after hypertensive pregnancy
Biannual zilebesiran associated with substantial BP reductions
Future of Lipid-Lowering Therapies
Encouraging data for lepodisiran as Lp(a) lowering therapy
Gene editing may change the treatment landscape of hypercholesterolaemia
REPRIEVE: Mechanisms behind MACE reduction in HIV population on pitavastatin
Recaticimab may offer a solution for uncontrolled hypercholesterolaemia
Atrial Fibrillation and Sudden Cardiac Death
Abelacimab substantially lowers bleeding risk compared with rivaroxaban
Liraglutide may improve post-ablation outcomes in obese patients with AF
Single or dual cardioversion in patients with obesity and AF?
NOAH-AFNET 6: Does the duration of AHRE influence response to edoxaban?
ARTESIA: How useful is anticoagulation in subclinical AF?
Jewel IDE: High compliance rates for novel patch wearable cardioverter defibrillator
Sudden cardiac death in athletes: incidence, causes, and trends over 20 years
Miscellaneous Trials
Successful results for semaglutide in the highly anticipated SELECT trial
Can a walking intervention improve functional status and quality of life in HFrEF?
Head-to-head: Surgical embolectomy versus ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis in high-risk pulmonary embolism
Related Articles
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com