https://doi.org/10.55788/e5dcacfb
“We know that the success rate of AF ablation is lower in obese patients,” claimed Dr Jeffrey Goldberger (University of Miami, FL, USA) [1]. “Therefore, weight loss and RFM were added as a Class 1 recommendation for obese or overweight patients with AF” [1,2]. The current, phase 4 LEAF study (NCT03856632) compared RFM alone with RFM plus treatment with the GLP-1 agonist liraglutide as therapy before ablation for AF in obese patients [1,3]. “The RFM programme included diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia control, as well as exercise prescription, dietary interventions, sleep apnoea assessment, and alcohol reduction strategies,” said Dr Goldberger [1].
The participants (n=65) were randomised 1:1 to the 2 treatment options. After 3 months of therapy, 59 participants (mean age of 62 years; 27% women; BMI ≥27 kg/m2) underwent ablation, after which the therapy was continued for another 6 months. Subsequently, all participants received RFM for another 6 months.
“At the time of ablation, there was significant weight loss in both groups, but the difference in weight loss between the study arms was not statistically significant (P=0.09),” noted Dr Goldberger. Similarly, both arms showed a significant reduction in epicardial adipose tissue from baseline to the time of ablation (mean 9.0 mm vs 8.2 mm; P<0.001), but no significant difference was reported between the groups (P=0.23). The 1-year freedom from AF or atrial flutter was higher in the liraglutide arm than in the RFM alone arm (83% vs 57%; P=0.036).
Dr Goldberger mentioned that this was a single-centre study with a small sample size. “Although further follow-up is ongoing and additional analyses are pending, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings,” he decided.
- Goldberger JJ, et al. Liraglutide effect on atrial fibrillation (LEAF) study. FS06, AHA Scientific Sessions 2023, 11–13 November, Philadelphia, USA.
- Hindricks G, et al. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):373–498.
- Goldberger JJ, et al. Heart Rhythm 2023;20(7): 1079.
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Single or dual cardioversion in patients with obesity and AF? Next Article
Abelacimab substantially lowers bleeding risk compared with rivaroxaban »
« Single or dual cardioversion in patients with obesity and AF? Next Article
Abelacimab substantially lowers bleeding risk compared with rivaroxaban »
Table of Contents: AHA 2023
Featured articles
Abelacimab substantially lowers bleeding risk compared with rivaroxaban
Hot Topics in CAD/PAD
MINT: Liberal or restrictive transfusion strategy in MI with anaemia?
ORBITA-2 confirms PCI effective for symptom relief in patients with stable angina
Nicotinamide riboside shows promising trend for walking function in PAD
Pemafibrate reduces microvascular complications of PAD and T2D
Dapagliflozin improves cardiometabolic outcomes in myocardial infarction
Optimising Hypertension Outcomes
Edoxaban versus warfarin in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Sodium intake and blood pressure: new insights
Post-partum intervention lowers BP after hypertensive pregnancy
Biannual zilebesiran associated with substantial BP reductions
Future of Lipid-Lowering Therapies
Encouraging data for lepodisiran as Lp(a) lowering therapy
Gene editing may change the treatment landscape of hypercholesterolaemia
REPRIEVE: Mechanisms behind MACE reduction in HIV population on pitavastatin
Recaticimab may offer a solution for uncontrolled hypercholesterolaemia
Atrial Fibrillation and Sudden Cardiac Death
Abelacimab substantially lowers bleeding risk compared with rivaroxaban
Liraglutide may improve post-ablation outcomes in obese patients with AF
Single or dual cardioversion in patients with obesity and AF?
NOAH-AFNET 6: Does the duration of AHRE influence response to edoxaban?
ARTESIA: How useful is anticoagulation in subclinical AF?
Jewel IDE: High compliance rates for novel patch wearable cardioverter defibrillator
Sudden cardiac death in athletes: incidence, causes, and trends over 20 years
Miscellaneous Trials
Successful results for semaglutide in the highly anticipated SELECT trial
Can a walking intervention improve functional status and quality of life in HFrEF?
Head-to-head: Surgical embolectomy versus ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis in high-risk pulmonary embolism
Related Articles
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com