Monotherapy with the oral JAK1-selective inhibitor upadacitinib was assessed over 14 weeks in patients with RA with an inadequate response to methotrexate in the SELECT-MONOTHERAPY trial. In this trial, therapy with upadacitinib showed statistically significant improvements in clinical and functional outcomes versus continuing methotrexate. The safety profile was similar to previous upadacitinib studies, when the JAK1 inhibitor was given together with methotrexate [2].
To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with upadacitinib, a long-term extension period of SELECT-MONOTHERAPY was performed. In the double-blind period, patients on stable methotrexate were randomised to either continue methotrexate or switch to once-daily upadacitinib in 2 doses (15 mg and 30 mg) of monotherapy for 14 weeks. From 14 weeks on, patients previously treated with methotrexate were treated with the lower or higher upadacitinib dose according to a prespecified treatment protocol. Starting at week 26, patients that did not reach clinical disease activity index (CDAI) ≤10 were allowed to use conventional background therapy with disease-modifying drugs in addition to upadacitinib.
During the ACR, the results at 48 weeks were presented [1]. Of 648 patients starting the double-blind phase of the SELECT-MONOTHERAPY trial, 598 (92%) completed 14 weeks and entered the extension period. At 48 weeks, 16% of patients had discontinued treatment. In the extension period, for patients treated with upadacitinib, clinical and functional outcomes continued to improve or were maintained: 55% and 68% of patients treated with upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg, respectively, achieved a Disease Activity Score 28/C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) <2.6. The corresponding percentages for the CDAI ≤2.8 were 28% and 42%, respectively. Patients that switched from methotrexate to upadacitinib achieved similar responses at week 48 compared to those who received the JAK1 inhibitor from the beginning.
The safety profile was consistent with earlier experiences with upadacitinib. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were infections (urinary tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis bronchitis), worsening of RA, herpes zoster, alanine aminotransferase increase, and blood creatine phosphokinase increase. The most frequent serious adverse event was pneumonia (in 8 patients). The higher dose caused more side effects; however, this difference failed to reach statistical significance. Two patients in the upadacitinib 15 mg group developed deep vein thrombosis, and another 2 pulmonary embolisms; all patients affected had at least 1 risk factor for deep vein thrombosis.
The authors concluded that upadacitinib in both doses results in similar improvement in symptoms and physical function in RA patients, with an overall favourable benefit-risk profile.
- Smolen J et al. Abstract 0513. ACR 2019, 9-13 November, Atlanta (GA/USA).
- Smolen J et al. Lancet 2019;393;2303-2311.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Proteome abnormalities improve prediction of RA development Next Article
Opioids: no quality of life benefits for OA patients »
« Proteome abnormalities improve prediction of RA development Next Article
Opioids: no quality of life benefits for OA patients »
Table of Contents: ACR 2019
Featured articles
Late-Breaking Abstracts
Lowest risk of infection after therapy with an IL-12/IL-23 blocker
Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease: an independent risk factor for cardiovascular complications
Proteome abnormalities improve prediction of RA development
RA patients in remission benefit from continued therapy with conventional DMARDs
Selective IL-23 blocker shows remarkable efficacy in patients with psoriatic arthritis
Corticosteroid therapy in GCA: higher platelets – lower relapse rate
Spotlight on Rheumatoid Arthritis
Filgotinib promising in RA patients naïve to methotrexate
Sustained efficacy of monotherapy with upadacitinib after 48 weeks
Biologics show similar activity in patients with elderly-onset RA
Tocilizumab outperforms rituximab in RA patients with low level of synovial B cell infiltration
Treatment decisions should not be guided by ultrasound findings
Cancer treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in RA patients?
What is Hot in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Anifrolumab succeeds in second phase 3 trial in SLE
Depression closely related to fatigue in SLE patients
Spondyloarthritis – The Beat Goes On
Psoriasis onset determines sequence of symptoms
Higher psychiatric comorbidity in women with PsA
JAK1 inhibition shows remarkable efficacy in AS
CARDAS study shows increased prevalence of cardiac valvular disorders in AS patients
Osteoarthritis – State-of-the-Art
Hand OA: low-dose corticosteroids improve symptoms
Opioids: no quality of life benefits for OA patients
Walking speed is a predictor of mortality in patients with knee OA
Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disease
Few serious infections in offspring with exposure to non-TNFi biologics or tofacitinib
Prevention of congenital heart block may be possible with hydroxychloroquine
TNFi for RA during pregnancy – to stop or not to stop?
Vasculitis – Novel Treatment Modalities
Rituximab maintenance superior to azathioprine in ANCA-associated vasculitis
Prolonged remission after stop of tocilizumab for patients with giant cell arteritis
Best of the Posters
Antifibrotic therapy slows disease progression independent of corticosteroid use
Fibromyalgia patients often experienced abuse in childhood
Related Articles
February 4, 2020
Lowest risk of infection after therapy with an IL-12/IL-23 blocker
February 4, 2020
Biologics show similar activity in patients with elderly-onset RA
February 4, 2020
Psoriasis onset determines sequence of symptoms
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com