https://doi.org/10.55788/e239c1c1
T-VEC is a genetically modified herpes simplex 1 virus that, when injected into a cancer lesion, results in the lyses and release of tumour-antigens and subsequent stimulation of local and systemic immune responses [1]. The initial analysis of the large (n=150) phase 2, multicentre, randomised trial (NCT02211131) reported a significant survival benefit of neoadjuvant T-VEC compared with surgery alone after 2 years [2]. Prof. Reinhard Dummer (University of Zürich, Switzerland) presented the actual results of the final read-out after 5 years of follow-up [3].
The 5-year event-free survival in participants treated with neoadjuvant T-VEC was 43.7% versus 27.4% in participants with surgery alone (HR 0.57). The 5-year overall survival was 77.3% versus 62.7% (neoadjuvant T-VEC vs surgery; HR 0.54). Of note, more participants in the surgery-only arm received systemic anti-cancer treatment compared with the T-VEC arm: 78.3% vs 54.8% (for adjuvant therapy this was 31.9% vs 13.7%). Hazard ratios for both event-free and overall survival did not change compared with the 3-year survival data.
“The results from this final analysis suggest that intratumorally administered oncolytic agents like T-VEC can elicit a meaningful long-term systemic effect. This supports neoadjuvant T-VEC followed by surgery in advanced resectable melanoma,” concluded Prof. Dummer.
- Ramelyte E, et al. Cancer Cell. 2021;39(3):394–406.
- Dummer R, et al. Nat Med. 2021;27(10):1789–1796.
- Dummer R, et al. Final 5-year results of the phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) neoadjuvant treatment (Tx) plus surgery vs immediate surgery in patients (pts) with resectable stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma. Abstract LBA39, ESMO Congress 2022, 09–13 September, Paris, France.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Baseline ctDNA predicts survival in resected stage III–IV melanoma Next Article
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab outperforms adjuvant pembrolizumab in resectable stage III–IV melanomas »
« Baseline ctDNA predicts survival in resected stage III–IV melanoma Next Article
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab outperforms adjuvant pembrolizumab in resectable stage III–IV melanomas »
Table of Contents: ESMO 2022
Featured articles
Letter from the Editor
Colorectal Cancer
High pathological responses to neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition in locally advanced dMMR colon cancer
Fruquintinib: a potential new treatment for patients with refractory mCRC
Second-line avelumab is effective in patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC
Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer
Deep learning models predict the risk of relapse and the mutational profile in GIST
Addition of pembrolizumab to lenvatinib does not improve OS in advanced HCC
New, highly selective inhibitor of FGFR2 driver alterations and resistance mutations
Chemo-immunotherapy in gastric cancer is more effective when administered in parallel
Breast Cancer
Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes identify patients with immunogenic triple-negative breast cancer
OS benefit of abemaciclib in HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer not (yet) statistically significant
OS benefit of sacituzumab govitecan in pre-treated HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
Lung Cancer
A pathway from air pollution to lung cancer in non-smokers identified
Selective KRASG12C inhibitor sotorasib demonstrates superior PFS and ORR compared to docetaxel in previously treated patients with NSCLC
Promising clinical activity of tepotinib plus osimertinib in NSCLC with MET amplification after progression on first-line osimertinib
High pathological responses in borderline resectable NSCLC patients after induction with dual immunotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Melanoma
Treatment with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes for advanced melanoma outperforms ipilimumab
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab outperforms adjuvant pembrolizumab in resectable stage III–IV melanomas
Survival-benefit of neoadjuvant T-VEC maintained over 5 years of follow-up
Baseline ctDNA predicts survival in resected stage III–IV melanoma
Genitourinary Cancer – Prostate Cancer
Overall survival benefit of abiraterone in mHSPC is maintained for 7 years
Limited benefit of adding long-term ADT to post-operative radiotherapy in prostate cancer
Intensified ADT benefits biochemical progression-free survival in biochemically relapsed prostate cancer
Genitourinary Cancer – Non-Prostate Cancer
Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab does not improve survival in patients with localised RCC at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy
Triple therapy improves progression-free survival in patients with advanced RCC versus dual therapy
Adjuvant atezolizumab does not improve outcomes for patients with RCC and increased risk of recurrence
Gynaecological cancers
OS benefit for advanced ovarian cancer patients treated with maintenance olaparib
Maintenance tegafur-uracil does not improve survival in locally advanced cervical cancer
Head and Neck Cancer
Adding first-line pembrolizumab to CRT in locally advanced HNSCC does not significantly prolong survival or event-free survival
5-FU-free chemotherapy combination as an alternative for first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic HNSCC
Epstein Barr virus-specific autologous cytotoxic T lymphocytes do not improve survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Related Articles
November 17, 2022
Letter from the Editor
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com