https://doi.org/10.55788/7653bcb5
Results from the phase 3 CheckMate 914 trial demonstrated that adjuvant treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab did not improve survival in patients with stage II–III localised renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at risk of post-nephrectomy relapse.
Patients with stage II–III localised RCC have a substantial risk of post-nephrectomy relapse [1]. Approved adjuvant therapeutic options include sunitinib (USA only) and pembrolizumab [2]. Previously, dual immune checkpoint blockade with nivolumab and ipilimumab improved long-term survival versus sunitinib in patients with untreated advanced RCC [3]. The current analysis of the CheckMate 914 trial (NCT03138512) evaluated the clinical outcomes of adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab in the setting of resected stage II–III clear-cell RCC with a high risk of recurrence. Prof. Robert Motzer (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA) presented the results [4].
A total of 816 patients were randomised 1:1 to receive nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks, 12 doses) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks, 4 doses) or a placebo after radical of partial nephrectomy with negative surgical margins. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. In the case of non-significant DFS endpoints, no formal analysis of OS was to be performed.
With 37.0 months of median follow-up, the primary endpoint of DFS was not met (HR 0.92; P=0.53). DFS rates at 24 months were 76.4% in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm versus 74.0% in the placebo arm. Of note, 43% of participants discontinued treatment in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm versus 11% in the placebo arm. The incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events was 28% and 2% for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab and placebo arms, respectively.
Based on these results, Prof. Motzer concluded that “adjuvant treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab does not improve survival in patients with stage II–III localised clear-cell RCC. The safety of nivolumab/ipilimumab in this population is consistent with the known profile of this combination in patients with advanced RCC.”
- Motzer RJ, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(35):3916–3923.
- Powles T, et al. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(12):1511–1519.
- Motzer RJ, et al. Cancer 2022;128(11):2085–2097.
- Motzer RJ, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) vs placebo (PBO) for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy: Results from the randomized, phase III CheckMate 914 trial. Abstract LBA4, ESMO Congress 2022, 09–13 September, Paris, France.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
« Triple therapy improves progression-free survival in patients with advanced RCC versus dual therapy Next Article
Maintenance tegafur-uracil does not improve survival in locally advanced cervical cancer »
Table of Contents: ESMO 2022
Featured articles
Letter from the Editor
Colorectal Cancer
High pathological responses to neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition in locally advanced dMMR colon cancer
Fruquintinib: a potential new treatment for patients with refractory mCRC
Second-line avelumab is effective in patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC
Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer
Deep learning models predict the risk of relapse and the mutational profile in GIST
Addition of pembrolizumab to lenvatinib does not improve OS in advanced HCC
New, highly selective inhibitor of FGFR2 driver alterations and resistance mutations
Chemo-immunotherapy in gastric cancer is more effective when administered in parallel
Breast Cancer
Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes identify patients with immunogenic triple-negative breast cancer
OS benefit of abemaciclib in HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer not (yet) statistically significant
OS benefit of sacituzumab govitecan in pre-treated HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
Lung Cancer
A pathway from air pollution to lung cancer in non-smokers identified
Selective KRASG12C inhibitor sotorasib demonstrates superior PFS and ORR compared to docetaxel in previously treated patients with NSCLC
Promising clinical activity of tepotinib plus osimertinib in NSCLC with MET amplification after progression on first-line osimertinib
High pathological responses in borderline resectable NSCLC patients after induction with dual immunotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Melanoma
Treatment with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes for advanced melanoma outperforms ipilimumab
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab outperforms adjuvant pembrolizumab in resectable stage III–IV melanomas
Survival-benefit of neoadjuvant T-VEC maintained over 5 years of follow-up
Baseline ctDNA predicts survival in resected stage III–IV melanoma
Genitourinary Cancer – Prostate Cancer
Overall survival benefit of abiraterone in mHSPC is maintained for 7 years
Limited benefit of adding long-term ADT to post-operative radiotherapy in prostate cancer
Intensified ADT benefits biochemical progression-free survival in biochemically relapsed prostate cancer
Genitourinary Cancer – Non-Prostate Cancer
Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab does not improve survival in patients with localised RCC at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy
Triple therapy improves progression-free survival in patients with advanced RCC versus dual therapy
Adjuvant atezolizumab does not improve outcomes for patients with RCC and increased risk of recurrence
Gynaecological cancers
OS benefit for advanced ovarian cancer patients treated with maintenance olaparib
Maintenance tegafur-uracil does not improve survival in locally advanced cervical cancer
Head and Neck Cancer
Adding first-line pembrolizumab to CRT in locally advanced HNSCC does not significantly prolong survival or event-free survival
5-FU-free chemotherapy combination as an alternative for first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic HNSCC
Epstein Barr virus-specific autologous cytotoxic T lymphocytes do not improve survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Related Articles
© 2023 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy