Myelofibrosis is primarily driven by constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT signalling pathway. This results in increased transcription of growth factors, inflammatory cytokines, and anti-apoptotic proteins such as BCL-XL [2]. Patients with myelofibrosis who have high-molecular-risk mutations, such as those in ASXL1, SRSF2, EZH2, U2AF1, and IDH1/2, at diagnosis will have shorter overall survival (OS) and increased risk of leukaemic transformation [3]. However, there are limited therapeutic options for patients with myelofibrosis who lose response to ruxolitinib. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that dual inhibition of both JAK2 and BCL-2/BCL-XL can enhance malignant cell death over JAK2 inhibition alone. Additionally, JAK2 plus BCL-2/BCL-XL inhibition could overcome acquired resistance to single-agent JAK inhibitor treatment [4].
An ongoing phase 2 study demonstrated that the combination of navitoclax plus ruxolitinib induced clinically meaningful spleen volume responses, improvement in Total Symptom Score, and reduction in bone marrow fibrosis grading in patients with myelofibrosis and suboptimal or failed responses to ruxolitinib alone [5]. Patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib alone who then received navitoclax plus ruxolitinib achieved clinically meaningful improvements in spleen volume and symptom burden. “Notably, these improvements were independent of the presence of high-risk molecular mutations or high numbers of total gene mutations at baseline,” Dr Pemmaraju mentioned.
Additionally, preliminary results from ongoing cytokine analyses suggested that dual therapy with navitoclax and ruxolitinib can help modulate key cytokines previously implicated in myeloproliferative neoplasm symptom improvement in patients with myelofibrosis with suboptimal response to ruxolitinib alone. The modulation of these disease-relevant proinflammatory cytokines correlated with reductions in spleen volume.
- Scherber RM & Mesa RA. Blood Rev. 2020;42:100716.
- Byrne M, et al. Ther Adv Hematol. 2018;9:251-9.
- Tse C, et al. Cancer Res. 2008;68:3421-8.
- Waibel M, et al. Cell Rep. 2013;5:1047-59.
- Pemmaraju N, et al. The Addition of Navitoclax to Ruxolitinib Demonstrates Efficacy within Different High-Risk Populations in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Myelofibrosis. 62nd ASH Annual Meeting, 5-8 December 2020. Abstract 52.
Posted on
Previous Article
« New insights into genetics of MPN Next Article
Interventions in JAK/STAT signalling pathway »
« New insights into genetics of MPN Next Article
Interventions in JAK/STAT signalling pathway »
Table of Contents: ASH 2020
Featured articles
COVID-19
More complicated course of COVID-19 in leukaemia patients
Older age and imatinib treatment associated with COVID-19 mortality in CML
Allogeneic SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells to treat COVID-19
More severe COVID-19 outcomes for patients with haematologic malignancies
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
Improved outcomes, but still substantial part experiences relapses
Strong correlation between peripheral blood and bone marrow NGS MRD
Encouraging outcomes after autoHCT in patients with ALL
Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
Prognostic validity of AML composite model in predicting mortality
Venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents in favourable-risk AML
Encouraging clinical activity of decitabine plus ipilimumab in R/R or secondary MDS/AML
AML patients with specific mutations are unlikely to achieve MRD
Comparable outcomes with gilteritinib or quizartinib in R/R AML
First-in-class macrophage immune checkpoint inhibitor in AML
Bispecific DART® as salvage therapy for primary induction failure and early relapse
Gilteritinib in R/R AML patients priorly treated with midostaurin or sorafenib
Addition of venetoclax provides an effective, lower-intensity regimen
Chronic Leukaemia
Bosutinib effective and well tolerated in newly diagnosed CP-CML
Efficacy and safety of ponatinib in patients with CP-CML who failed second-generation TKIs
First-in-class STAMP inhibitor versus bosutinib in resistant or intolerant CML
PFS and ORR benefits of first-line ibrutinib-based treatment in CLL
Multiple Myeloma
Validation of MY-RADS response assessment category criteria
High symptom burden in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed MM
Added value of ixazomib to lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed MM
Survival of transplant-eligible newly diagnosed MM in FORTE trial
Better survival with upfront autoSCT versus bortezomib-based intensification
Subcutaneous daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in R/R MM
Melflufen well tolerated with encouraging activity in heavily pretreated R/R MM
Initial data of FcRH5/CD3 T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody
Lymphoma
CD58 aberrations limit durable responses to CD19 CAR T-cell therapy
Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory indolent NHL
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
MPN disease burden, quality of life, and treatment patterns
Interventions in JAK/STAT signalling pathway
Novel, orally available inhibitor of BCL-XL/BCL-2
New insights into genetics of MPN
Immune Thrombocytopenia
Mycophenolate efficacious and tolerable, even in elderly patients
First-in-class antibody sutimlimab selectively inhibits classical complement pathway
BTK inhibition provides clinically active and durable platelet response
Haemophilia, Sickle Cell Disease, Thalassaemia
First results from gene therapy trial in haemophilia B
Impact of haemophilia on children and their caregivers
Promising CRISPR gene editing results in β-thalassaemia and sickle cell disease
Erythroid maturation agent in patients with β-thalassaemia requiring regular RBC transfusions
Related Articles
February 18, 2021
Initial data of FcRH5/CD3 T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody
February 18, 2021
AML patients with specific mutations are unlikely to achieve MRD
February 22, 2021
Letter from the Editor
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com