In case of difficult-to-treat dermatologic adverse events (AEs) in the course of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for cancer, dermatologists are in demand for consultations. Dermatologic AEs often affect the quality of life of the cancer patients as first-line symptomatic treatment may fail to alleviate the burden of conditions such as urticaria or eczema. A retrospective study was conducted with single-centre data from electronic medical records from 48 cancer patients to assess omalizumab as a possible treatment for these side effects.
Of the 48 participants included, 75% suffered from moderate dermatologic AEs and 25% had severe dermatologic pathologies. In 54% of the cases, these events were caused by cancer treatment with anti-programmed cell death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. All of the dermatologic AEs had shown resistance to topical therapy with corticosteroids. The 3 most frequent dermatologic AEs were urticaria (63%), bullous pemphigoid (17%), and eczema (13%).
Response to anti-immunoglobulin E therapy with omalizumab was seen in 94% of the patients. Treatment effects were defined as significant improvement in case of change in severity of dermatologic AEs of ≥2 grades or full resolution. More than half (52%) of the study subjects that had a response to omalizumab treatment achieved this significant improvement. Interestingly, 76% of the patients needed only a single dose of omalizumab for a maximal clinical amelioration.
Successful therapy of the dermatologic AEs also had an impact on the cancer treatment as 78% of 18 patients that had to suspend their oncological therapy due to these AEs were able to be re-treated. In 1 additional case, re-treatment was possible after dose reduction. No life-threatening disorders resulted from omalizumab.
Although the study evaluated omalizumab in an uncontrolled setting, the extent of clinical benefit paired with treatment safety may render omalizumab eligible for the treatment of dermatologic events in cancer patients.
- Barrios DM, et al. Late-breaking abstract, AAD Virtual Meeting Experience, 12-14 June 2020.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Better compliance in AD skin care with novel emollient stick Next Article
Can gene expression help to pick the right biologic to treat psoriasis in cancer patients? »
« Better compliance in AD skin care with novel emollient stick Next Article
Can gene expression help to pick the right biologic to treat psoriasis in cancer patients? »
Table of Contents: AAD 2020
Featured articles
Late-Breaking Abstracts
IL-17A and IL-17F blockade remarkably effective in psoriasis
Good response and pruritus reduction in AD with novel selective JAK1 inhibitor
Novel IL-23 blocker risankizumab highly effective and tolerable in psoriasis
Tape stripping – a painless way to distinguish AD and psoriasis?
IL-4/IL-13 blocker dupilumab effective in children with severe AD
Pembrolizumab leads to higher toxicity risk in obese melanoma patients
Can gene expression help to pick the right biologic to treat psoriasis in cancer patients?
Omalizumab for cancer-induced dermatoses
Psoriasis – What Is Hot?
Psoriasis therapy for children and pregnancies
Biologic psoriasis treatment to lower cardiovascular risk?
Systemic Therapies for Dermatologists
How to manage cutaneous side effects of immunotherapy
Cannabinoids: a future role in dermatology?
Hidradenitis Suppurativa/Acne Inversa
Biologics in HS – a growing armamentarium
Pearls of the Posters
Selective IL-23 blocker safe in elderly psoriasis patients
Spironolactone safe for androgenetic alopecia in cancer survivors
Baricitinib beneficial in head and neck AD
ECLIPSE trial: skin clearance independent of PsA status at baseline
Related Articles
August 28, 2020
Letter from the Editor
August 6, 2020
Cannabinoids: a future role in dermatology?
August 19, 2020
Selective IL-23 blocker safe in elderly psoriasis patients
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com