Biologics like TNF blockers or inhibitors of IL-17A and IL-23 have started a new era of possible achievements in psoriasis treatment. However, there is a worrisome and ongoing discussion about an increased risk of cancer linked to psoriasis management with agents in these drug classes. âClinicians and dermatologists often face difficult decisions in prescribing these drugs, especially to those who have a history of cancer or those who have a current active cancer,â said Dr Nikolai Klebanov (Brigham and Womenâs Hospital, USA).
To gain further insight, a theoretical and hypothesis-generating, observational retrospective study was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Over 9,000 patients suffering from 27 different cancer types were categorised into those with low or high expression of TNF, IL-17, and IL-23 (cut-off was median gene expression per gene). A possible correlation was analysed between cancer survival and gene expression.
An improved survival with a low HR was seen only in patients with renal cell carcinoma and low IL-23A expression (531 total events; HR 0.53; adjusted P<0.0033). In cutaneous melanoma and sarcoma, a low expression of TNF had a negative impact on cancer survival (total events 430; HR 1.65; adjusted P=0.0168; and total events 262, HR 1.92; adjusted P=0.0495). These findings suggest that TNF-inhibitor use could be harmful in patients with active melanoma or sarcoma, as Dr Klebanov commented.
In view of these interesting findings about potential cancer and biologics in psoriasis treatment, the authors saw a need for further studies that comprise testing for possible confounders by creating multivariate models, for example. âHopefully, with future human or animal studies we could have a better idea of the safety of these medications for these sorts of patients,â stated Dr Klebanov.
- Perez-Chada L, et al. Late-breaking abstract, AAD Virtual Meeting Experience, 12-14 June 2020.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Omalizumab for cancer-induced dermatoses Next Article
Pembrolizumab leads to higher toxicity risk in obese melanoma patients »
« Omalizumab for cancer-induced dermatoses Next Article
Pembrolizumab leads to higher toxicity risk in obese melanoma patients »
Table of Contents: AAD 2020
Featured articles
Late-Breaking Abstracts
IL-17A and IL-17F blockade remarkably effective in psoriasis
Good response and pruritus reduction in AD with novel selective JAK1 inhibitor
Novel IL-23 blocker risankizumab highly effective and tolerable in psoriasis
Tape stripping – a painless way to distinguish AD and psoriasis?
IL-4/IL-13 blocker dupilumab effective in children with severe AD
Pembrolizumab leads to higher toxicity risk in obese melanoma patients
Can gene expression help to pick the right biologic to treat psoriasis in cancer patients?
Omalizumab for cancer-induced dermatoses
Psoriasis â What Is Hot?
Psoriasis therapy for children and pregnancies
Biologic psoriasis treatment to lower cardiovascular risk?
Systemic Therapies for Dermatologists
How to manage cutaneous side effects of immunotherapy
Cannabinoids: a future role in dermatology?
Hidradenitis Suppurativa/Acne Inversa
Biologics in HS â a growing armamentarium
Pearls of the Posters
Selective IL-23 blocker safe in elderly psoriasis patients
Spironolactone safe for androgenetic alopecia in cancer survivors
Baricitinib beneficial in head and neck AD
ECLIPSE trial: skin clearance independent of PsA status at baseline
Related Articles
August 28, 2020
Letter from the Editor
August 6, 2020
Psoriasis therapy for children and pregnancies
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com