By analysing data from their own database, Dr Yue Che (University of Düsseldorf, Germany) and colleagues found 575 post-chemotherapy residual tumour resections, performed in 516 patients, including 153 procedures in patients with elevated serum tumour markers (human chorionic gonadotropin [β-HCG] >2.0 mIU/mL; α-fetoprotein [AFP] >7.0 µg/L). Of these patients, 55 received resection after first-line chemotherapy and 98 after second- or further-line (salvage) chemotherapy [1].
Viable cancer in the resected specimen was more frequently present in the salvage group compared with the first-line group (49% vs 16%; P=0.0002). The presence of viable cancer was a predictor of survival in both groups. In the first-line group, teratoma was the most common type (52.7%), followed by necrosis/fibrosis (30.9%) and viable cancer (16.4%).
Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine predictors for residual tumour resection histology and oncological outcome. A preoperative serum level of AFP ≥30 µg/L was a predictor of viable cancer in the first-line group (56%; P=0.016) and in the salvage setting (67%; P=0.0017). The overall relapse-free rate was significantly worse in the salvage group compared with the first-line group (22.7% vs 50%; P=0.00032), as was the survival rate (37.8% vs 65%; P=0.0059). Serum AFP ≥30 µg/L and β-HCG ≥20 mIU/mL were significant factors affecting survival in the first-line group.
Dr Che argued that patients with serum AFP ≥30 µg/L and β-HCG ≥20 mIU/mL after first-line chemotherapy should receive salvage chemotherapy instead of surgery because chances for viable cancer and relapse are high and survival is poor. These patients will probably not benefit from post-chemotherapy residual tumour resection, and salvage chemotherapy should be the preferred treatment. After second- or further-line therapy, the prognosis of patients with elevated markers and surgery is poor, regardless of tumour marker levels. However, 38% of these patients are long-term survivors, which justifies post-chemotherapy residual tumour resection in this setting.
- Che Y. Post-chemotherapy residual tumor resection in patients with elevated tumor markers. P0662, EAU21 Virtual, 8–12 July 2021.
Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« EAU TV: Robotic surgery and advanced prostate cancer Next Article
Recommendations for the management of indeterminate small testis masses »
« EAU TV: Robotic surgery and advanced prostate cancer Next Article
Recommendations for the management of indeterminate small testis masses »
Table of Contents: EAU 2021
Featured articles
EAU TV: Robotic surgery and advanced prostate cancer
LUTS & BPH
Best of EAU: The surgical armamentarium is evolving
IPSS: Visual alternatives to aid comprehension and new risk prediction models
Urinary Tract Infections
Prophylactic treatments for recurrent urinary tract infections
Failure of conservative management in emphysematous pyelonephritis
Antibiotic treatment of healthcare-associated infections
Prostate Cancer
EAU TV: Robotic surgery and advanced prostate cancer
EAU TV: The best on prostate cancer and incontinence & andrology
Best of EAU: Updates on imaging and treatment of prostate cancer
Radiographic PFS benefit of adding abiraterone to ADT and docetaxel in mCSPC
177Lu-PSMA-617: A new class of effective therapy
Testis and Penile Cancer
Best of EAU: New advances in testicular and penile cancer
Recommendations for the management of indeterminate small testis masses
Residual tumour resection in case of elevated markers
Bladder Cancer
Best of EAU: Highlights on bladder cancer
ctDNA can guide adjuvant immunotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Durvalumab ± tremelimumab by cisplatin eligibility in metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Circulating tumour cells could aid in the decision to give neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Renal Cancer
Best of EAU: Immune cell populations have prognostic value in RCC
KEYNOTE-564: First positive phase 3 results with adjuvant checkpoint inhibition in RCC
PSMA PET-CT more accurate than standard-of-care imaging in RCC
Worse renal function after radical versus partial nephrectomy
Related Articles
August 20, 2020
Debate: upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy or not?
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com