Antimicrobial prophylaxis in TURB
A multicentre, randomised controlled trial assessed whether omitting antimicrobial prophylaxis is safe in patients undergoing TURB. The primary endpoint was post-operative fever.
Of 459 included patients, 202 (44.1%) received antimicrobial prophylaxis and 257 (55.9%) did not. Results indicated that fever occurred in 6 (2.9%) patients with antimicrobial prophylaxis versus 8 (3.1%) without antimicrobial prophylaxis (P=0.44). Furthermore, no differences were found for (clot) retention (P=0.20), tumour size (P=0.20). A multivariable, logistic regression demonstrated no significant harm in omitting antimicrobial prophylaxis when controlled for (clot) retention and tumour size (P=0.85). This data demonstrated that omitting antimicrobial prophylaxis was safe in patients undergoing TURB without an indwelling, pre-operative catheter/nephrostomy/DJ and a negative pre-operative urinary culture [2].
Reducing the frequency of follow-up cystoscopies
To detect recurrence and progression, patients with NMIBC require frequent follow-up cystoscopies. The current multicentre study assessed whether the urinary biomarker test ADXBLADDER could aid in reducing unnecessary follow-up cystoscopies, improving quality of life, and decreasing costs [3].
Of all included patients (n=1,416), 126 (8.9%) experienced a recurrence, 41 (2.9%) of whom recurring with a high-grade tumour and/or carcinoma in situ (CIS). In a subgroup of 721 patients with non-invasive, low-grade tumour (no CIS) at the previous visit, 85 (11.8%) recurred, 13 (1.8%) had a high-grade tumour and/or CIS. ADXBLADDER was the only significant variable for high-grade tumour and/or CIS in patients that previously had a low-grade tumour without CIS. ADXBLADDER had a sensitivity of 69.2% and a specificity of 75%. A less intensive follow-up surveillance schedule utilising this ADXBLADDER test could lead to a reduction of up to 60% in unnecessary cystoscopies during follow-up.
Transcriptome sequencing of BCG-treated bladder cancer
Patients with T1 high-grade bladder cancer undergo TURB followed by adjuvant intravesical instillations with BCG. Current clinical risk stratification is insufficient to identify patients at risk of BCG failure. To this end, the current study aimed to identify molecular predictors of BCG failure.
Gene expression profiling of primary BCG-naïve patients with T1 high-grade bladder cancer identified 3 molecular subtypes that corresponded to clinical outcome after BCG therapy. So, molecular subtyping can improve clinical risk stratification by identification of patients with BCG subtype 3 tumours that are more suitable candidates for early radical cystectomy or novel bladder-sparing treatments given the poor outcome if treated by BCG [4].
Gene therapy for NMIBC
Despite optimal treatment, >50% of patients with NMIBC who have an initial response to BCG will experience recurrence and progression. Because treatment options are limited, there is an unmet need for local, effective, bladder-preserving treatment options.
Nadofaragene firadenovec is a non-replicating recombinant type 5 adenovirus vector-based gene therapy that delivers a copy of the human IFNA2b gene. Its safety and efficacy were assessed in a phase 3 trial (NCT02773849) that included 157 patients with high-grade, BCG-unresponsive NMIBC [5].
The results demonstrated no significant differences in response rates at 3 and 15 months between diverse subgroups, including men versus women, age groups, BCG-refractory versus BCG-relapsed, ≤3 versus >3 prior lines of treatment, 0 or ≥1 prior non-BCG regimens, and ≤3 or >3 prior courses of BCG.
These results demonstrated that nadofaragene firadenovec is effective regardless of patient characteristics or prior treatment history. Nadofaragene firadenovec represents a potential novel treatment option for patients with high-grade BCG-unresponsive NMIBC that advance in the current treatment paradigm.
- Rouprêt M. Best of EAU21: Bladder Cancer. EAU21 Virtual, 8–12 July 2021.
- Baten E, et al. P0733, EAU21 Virtual, 8–12 July 2021.
- Sylvester RJ, et al. P0725, EAU21 Virtual, 8–12 July 2021.
- De Jong FC, et al. P0442, EAU21 Virtual, 8–12 July 2021.
- Narayan V, et al. P0745, EAU21 Virtual, 8–12 July 2021.
Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« ctDNA can guide adjuvant immunotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer Next Article
Worse renal function after radical versus partial nephrectomy »
« ctDNA can guide adjuvant immunotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer Next Article
Worse renal function after radical versus partial nephrectomy »
Table of Contents: EAU 2021
Featured articles
EAU TV: Robotic surgery and advanced prostate cancer
LUTS & BPH
Best of EAU: The surgical armamentarium is evolving
IPSS: Visual alternatives to aid comprehension and new risk prediction models
Urinary Tract Infections
Prophylactic treatments for recurrent urinary tract infections
Failure of conservative management in emphysematous pyelonephritis
Antibiotic treatment of healthcare-associated infections
Prostate Cancer
EAU TV: Robotic surgery and advanced prostate cancer
EAU TV: The best on prostate cancer and incontinence & andrology
Best of EAU: Updates on imaging and treatment of prostate cancer
Radiographic PFS benefit of adding abiraterone to ADT and docetaxel in mCSPC
177Lu-PSMA-617: A new class of effective therapy
Testis and Penile Cancer
Best of EAU: New advances in testicular and penile cancer
Recommendations for the management of indeterminate small testis masses
Residual tumour resection in case of elevated markers
Bladder Cancer
Best of EAU: Highlights on bladder cancer
ctDNA can guide adjuvant immunotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Durvalumab ± tremelimumab by cisplatin eligibility in metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Circulating tumour cells could aid in the decision to give neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Renal Cancer
Best of EAU: Immune cell populations have prognostic value in RCC
KEYNOTE-564: First positive phase 3 results with adjuvant checkpoint inhibition in RCC
PSMA PET-CT more accurate than standard-of-care imaging in RCC
Worse renal function after radical versus partial nephrectomy
Related Articles
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com