https://doi.org/10.55788/432528da
moxifloxacin.
“Individuals who have a pulmonary infection with Mycobacterium xenopi have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year mortality rate of 69% [1],” expressed Prof. Claire Andrejak (CHU Amiens, France). “It occurs mainly in patients with chronic respiratory disease. Unfortunately, the optimal treatment is unknown.” The phase 3 CaMoMy trial (NCT01298336) included patients with M. xenopi pulmonary infection (n=92) who were randomised to a regimen of ethambutol plus rifampicin plus clarithromycin or to a regimen of ethambutol plus rifampicin plus moxifloxacin [2]. The primary objective was to determine the 6-month sputum conversion rate.
In the overall population, the 6-month sputum conversion rate was 93.2%. “Next to this, we observed clinical improvements after 6 months, with an anorexia rate of 19.2% versus 28% at baseline, a weight loss rate of 15.4% versus 48.3% at baseline, and a fatigue rate of 34.6% versus 58.5% at inclusion,” said Prof. Andrejak.
There was no difference between the 2 treatment regimens concerning the 6-month sputum conversion rate, fatigue rate, weight loss, or anorexia rate. Severe adverse events were documented in 18.6% of the participants in the clarithromycin arm and 20.0% of those in the moxifloxacin arm. “These events were mostly related to the use of ethambutol,” explained Prof. Andrejak.
“We saw a high 6-month sputum conversion rate for 2 treatment regimens in our severely sick patient population, with the majority of patients having the cavitary form and a positive smear,” decided Prof. Andrejak.
- Griffith DE, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care. 2007;175(4):367-416.
- Andrejak C, et al. xenopi pulmonary infection: a randomized clinical trial comparing rifampin plus ethambutol plus either clarithromycin or moxifloxacin: the CaMoMy study. Late-breaking abstracts: science that will impact clinical care. ATS 2024, 17–22 May, San Diego, USA.
Medical writing support was provided by Robert van den Heuvel.
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Patient-reported outcomes improve practice in MAC lung disease Next Article
BOREAS: Blood eosinophil count and FeNO levels predictive of dupilumab response in COPD »
« Patient-reported outcomes improve practice in MAC lung disease Next Article
BOREAS: Blood eosinophil count and FeNO levels predictive of dupilumab response in COPD »
Table of Contents: ATS 2024
Featured articles
NOTUS: Dupilumab safe and efficacious in COPD with type 2 inflammation
Sulthiame may be the next treatment for OSA
Miscellaneous Topics
Pirfenidone may alleviate disease burden in DRCB
Can mindfulness reduce depression and anxiety in ICU survivors?
Exercise and diet improve functional status in PAH
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
STARSCAPE: Zinpentraxin alfa does not ameliorate health status in IPF
COPD
COURSE: Encouraging results for tezepelumab in COPD
Ensifentrine delays transition from GOLD B to GOLD E in COPD
NOTUS: Dupilumab safe and efficacious in COPD with type 2 inflammation
BOREAS: Blood eosinophil count and FeNO levels predictive of dupilumab response in COPD
Respiratory Infections
Two regimens deliver high sputum conversion rates in M. xenopi pulmonary infection
Patient-reported outcomes improve practice in MAC lung disease
Novel RSV vaccine to prevent serious respiratory illness
Asthma
UCAP: Identify and treat undiagnosed COPD or asthma
Structural and functional lung improvement with dupilumab in asthma
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Is the Apnea Hypopnea Index ready to be replaced?
Does PAP therapy truly reduce mortality in OSA?
Sulthiame may be the next treatment for OSA
Related Articles
November 7, 2018
Gastroesophageal reflux, IPF and lessons learned
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com