Home > Gastroenterology > UEGW 2023 > Breakthroughs in Colorectal Lesions > Safer removal of large polyps with cold snare technique

Safer removal of large polyps with cold snare technique

Presented by
Dr Ingo Steinbrück, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Germany
Conference
UEGW 2-23
Trial
CHRONICLE
Doi
https://doi.org/10.55788/fd6977a2
Traditionally, the removal of smaller colorectal polyps, i.e. less than 10 mm in size, has been performed using cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR), while larger polyps, i.e. 20 mm and above, have typically been removed using hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (HS-EMR). This new study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of CS-EMR in removing large colorectal polyps.

The prospective, randomised, controlled trial, presented by Dr Ingo Steinbrück (Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Germany), enrolled 394 participants with non-pedunculated colorectal polyps measuring 20 mm or more [1]. This study primarily focused on major complications such as perforation or clinically significant post-endoscopic bleeding.

The results of this intention-to-treat analysis showed that the CS-EMR group had a significantly lower rate of major complications at 1% compared with the 8% observed in the HS-EMR group (P=0.001). These included a lower incidence of perforation (0% vs 4%; P=0.007) and post-endoscopic bleeding in the CS-EMR group (1% vs 4.5%; P=0.038).

In addition to these primary findings, the study also shed light on various secondary outcomes. For instance, the CS-EMR group exhibited a lower intraprocedural bleeding rate than the HS-EMR group (14% vs 22.9%; P=0.023). Still, the technical success rate was slightly lower in the CS-EMR group than in the HS-EMR group (92.2% vs 97.5%; P=0.017).

Dr Steinbrück concluded: "CS-EMR is superior in safety to HS-EMR, almost eliminating major adverse events. However, it presents a higher rate of residual neoplasia, necessitating careful lesion selection to mitigate recurrence risks.” Further analysis is required to identify the most suitable lesions for CS-EMR and to explore technical and procedural enhancements that could bolster its effectiveness.


    1. Steinbrück I, et al. Cold vs. hot snare resection of non-pedunculated polyps ≥2cm in the colorectum – first results from the prospective, randomized, controlled, multicentric CHRONICLE trial. LB06, UEG Week 2023, 14–17 October, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Copyright ©2023 Medicom Medical Publishers



Posted on