https://doi.org/10.55788/036372c0
“Oesophageal perforation may lead to mediastinitis, empyema, sepsis, and eventually, organ failure,” outlined Dr Alessandrino Terceiro de Oliveira (Federal University of Ceará, Brazil) [1]. “Surgical interventions to tackle this issue are associated with a mortality rate of up to 20%.” The single-centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled FORTAL trial compared the efficacy of E-SEMS versus EVT in participants with a traumatic oesophageal perforation (n=30).
No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes between the two arms. In the E-SEMS arm, 93.7% of the participants were discharged and 6.3% had deceased. The corresponding rates for the EVT arm were 71.4% (P=0.16) and 28.6% (P=0.16). Dr Terceiro de Oliveira added that the treatment duration was significantly longer in the E-SEMS arm than in the EVT arm (mean 45.8 days vs 24.4 days; P<0.05). In contrast, the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter among patients in the E-SEMS arm (number of days vs number of days; P=0.021). Finally, the mean cost of an E-SEMS procedure was substantially lower than the mean cost of an EVT procedure (€19,266 vs €38,453; P=0.013).
The current randomised-controlled trial provided insights into the differences between the 2 investigated surgical approaches in terms of treatment duration, length of hospital stay, and costs. Larger studies are needed to observe whether the procedures differ with regard to clinical outcomes.
- Terceiro de Oliveira A, et al. Endoscopic self-expandable metal stent (E-SEMS) versus endoscopy vacuum therapy (EVT) for traumatic esophageal perforations: the FORTAL randomized double-blind controlled comparative effectiveness trial. LB12, UEG Week 2023, 14–17 October, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copyright ©2023 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Digital intervention relieves symptoms and improves QoL in IBS Next Article
Is AI-assisted colonoscopy ready for clinical practice? »
« Digital intervention relieves symptoms and improves QoL in IBS Next Article
Is AI-assisted colonoscopy ready for clinical practice? »
Table of Contents: UEGW 2023
Featured articles
SEQUENCE: Risankizumab doubles endoscopic remission rates compared with ustekinumab in CD
What’s New in Artificial Intelligence
Digital intervention relieves symptoms and improves QoL in IBS
GastroGPT: Successful proof-of-concept study of gastroenterology-specific large language model
Other Therapeutics and Outcomes
Primary results from MAESTRO-NASH trial: resmetirom efficacious for NASH
Apraglutide: Advancing the treatment of short bowel syndrome
Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation in pCCA: a pilot study
Raising awareness for microscopic colitis: disease course and predictors
Outcomes of IBD Trials
DIVERSITY1: Filgotinib results in Crohn’s disease leave investigators puzzled
SEQUENCE: Risankizumab doubles endoscopic remission rates compared with ustekinumab in CD
Guselkumab provides benefits in UC regardless of advanced therapy history
INSPIRE: Risankizumab meets all efficacy endpoints in UC
Risankizumab resolves extraintestinal manifestations in CD
Obefazimod takes the spotlight as promising UC treatment
Rapid response to upadacitinib boosts outcomes in severe Crohn’s disease
LUCENT trials: Mirikizumab works in UC, regardless of targeted therapy history
ARTEMIS-UC: New kid in town for UC
Breakthroughs in Colorectal Lesions
Safer removal of large polyps with cold snare technique
Higher recurrence rates with cold snare EMR than with conventional EMR
How to deal with at-risk patients above the CRC screening age limit?
European CRC screening needs to be revised
Advances in Upper Endoscopy and Colonoscopy
Epinephrine boosts efficiency in gastric ESD
Artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy did not improve outcomes in Lynch syndrome
Can computer technology improve our everyday colonoscopy results?
Is AI-assisted colonoscopy ready for clinical practice?
Should we use E-SEMS or EVT for traumatic oesophageal perforations?
Related Articles
July 2, 2021
Ultra-processed food intake associated with IBD
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com