https://doi.org/10.55788/86ea8d61
The Marshall Plan is an ablation strategy that aims to perform a complete lesion set in patients with AF, with the following steps:
- vein of Marshall ethanol infusion,
- PVI,
- mitral line block,
- dome transection (roof or floor), and
- cavo-tricuspid isthmus line block.
Dr Thomas Pambrun (Bordeaux University Hospital, France) and colleagues conducted the prospective, monocentric PLAN-MARSHALL trial (NCT04206982), randomising 120 patients with persistent AF 1:1 to the Marshall Plan strategy for ablation or to PVI alone. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia >30 seconds at 12 months.
The current results indicated that the Marshall Plan may be superior to PVI alone: after a mean follow-up time of 10.5 months, the sinus maintenance rate was 69% in the PVI arm and 84% in the Marshall Plan arm (log-rank statistic 4.32; P=0.038). Dr Pambrun added that the results suggested that AF recurrence is relatively more common in the PVI arm (94% vs 75% of the recurrences), whereas atrial tachycardia was relatively more common in the Marshall Plan arm (25% vs 6%).
“Interestingly, looking at redo procedures, all the 9 patients in the PVI group had all 4 PV’s isolated, meaning there was no room for improvement,” said Dr Pambrun. “On the other hand, in the Marshall Plan arm, all patients who underwent redo procedures (n=6) had gaps in the lesion set, which means there is room for improvement in these patients.” Finally, in terms of complications, 1 case of oeso-pericardial fistula was reported in the PVI arm, and 1 massive groin haematoma was observed in the Marshall Plan arm.
- Pambrun T, et al. Marshall-PLAN vs PV isolation: Preliminary results of the monocentric randomized trial. Late-Breaking Science – Today and Tomorrow, EHRA 2023, 16–18 April, Barcelona, Spain.
Copyright ©2023 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Can ICD-EG-derived information improve ventricular tachycardia ablation outcomes? Next Article
CEASE-AF meets primary endpoint in persistent AF »
« Can ICD-EG-derived information improve ventricular tachycardia ablation outcomes? Next Article
CEASE-AF meets primary endpoint in persistent AF »
Table of Contents: EHRA 2023
Featured articles
CEASE-AF meets primary endpoint in persistent AF
ANTWERP score selects HF patients for AF ablation
Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Surgery saves lives in patients with oesophageal fistula
MANIFEST-PF: Good results for the pentaspline PFA catheter
POWER FAST III: High-power, short-duration radiofrequency ablation for AF
High-power, short-duration ablation linked to a higher stroke risk
Early or delayed ablation for AF?
CEASE-AF meets primary endpoint in persistent AF
Promising results for Marshall Plan ablation strategy
Updates on Devices
Can ICD-EG-derived information improve ventricular tachycardia ablation outcomes?
Prolonged ECG monitoring detects relevant arrhythmias in HCM
Does adaptive pacing work in patients with HF, LBBB, and intact AV conduction?
Can we identify patients who may not benefit from ICD therapy?
Miscellaneous
Statins display benefits for AF patients in a large population-based study
ANTWERP score selects HF patients for AF ablation
Epicardial ablation successful in Brugada syndrome
Highly increased risk of arrhythmias after mechanical ventilation for COVID-19
Related Articles
October 23, 2021
Cognitive problems seen in middle-aged COVID-19 survivors
August 22, 2022
Large impact of COVID-19 on dementia diagnosis and care
January 14, 2022
Blood pressure control disrupted during the pandemic
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com