https://doi.org/10.55788/caefb8b5
The ANTWOORD II study successfully validated the ANTWERP score, which aims to identify patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) who would benefit the most from ablation for AF. According to the authors, the results can be used to standardise shared decision-making in the clinic with regard to AF ablation.
The previously published ANTWOORD I study assessed the ANTWERP score, which predicts left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery after ablation in patients with HF and AF, scoring patients who have 1 or more of the following 4 clinical and imaging parameters: known aetiology, wide QRS, severe atrial dilation, and paroxysmal AF [1]. A higher score is related to a greater likelihood of non-recovery, whereas a lower score is linked to a greater likelihood of recovery (AUC 0.93). The current ANTWOORD II study aimed to externally validate these results. The trial included 605 patients with HF and impaired LVEF (<50%) who were referred for AF ablation [2]. The primary endpoint was the number of responders at 1-year follow-up. A response was defined as an LVEF >40% and +10% in case of HF with reduced ejection fraction and an LVEF ≥50% in case of HF with midrange ejection fraction.
“Patients with a low score had a high percentage of LVEF recovery, and patients with a high score had a low percentage of LVEF recovery,” said Dr Marco Bergonti (Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Switzerland). The corresponding AUC of the ANTWERP score was 0.859 (P<0.001). According to Dr Bergonti, the results were consistent across the LVEF spectrum and geographical regions. “The ANTWERP score identifies patients with HF who benefit the most from AF ablation,” said Dr Bergonti. Patients with a score <3 are estimated to have LVEF recovery in >90% of the cases and should receive early AF ablation. Those with a score >4 have a limited chance of responding (<20%) and physicians should look for alternative strategies to treat these patients. Finally, patients with a score of 3 or 4 have a recovery chance of approximately 50%. Further assessment is needed in these patients to decide which treatment strategy to apply.
-
- Bergonti M, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2022;358:45–50.
- Bergonti M, et al. Predicting LVEF-recovery after AF ablation in HF patients: The ANTWOORD II study. Late-Breaking Science – Today and Tomorrow, EHRA 2023, 16–18 April, Barcelona, Spain.
Copyright ©2023 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
« Epicardial ablation successful in Brugada syndrome Next Article
Statins display benefits for AF patients in a large population-based study »
Table of Contents: EHRA 2023
Featured articles
CEASE-AF meets primary endpoint in persistent AF
ANTWERP score selects HF patients for AF ablation
Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Surgery saves lives in patients with oesophageal fistula
MANIFEST-PF: Good results for the pentaspline PFA catheter
POWER FAST III: High-power, short-duration radiofrequency ablation for AF
High-power, short-duration ablation linked to a higher stroke risk
Early or delayed ablation for AF?
CEASE-AF meets primary endpoint in persistent AF
Promising results for Marshall Plan ablation strategy
Updates on Devices
Can ICD-EG-derived information improve ventricular tachycardia ablation outcomes?
Prolonged ECG monitoring detects relevant arrhythmias in HCM
Does adaptive pacing work in patients with HF, LBBB, and intact AV conduction?
Can we identify patients who may not benefit from ICD therapy?
Miscellaneous
Statins display benefits for AF patients in a large population-based study
ANTWERP score selects HF patients for AF ablation
Epicardial ablation successful in Brugada syndrome
Highly increased risk of arrhythmias after mechanical ventilation for COVID-19
Related Articles
Lung-cancer trial enrollment takes a hit amid COVID-19
Nebulised aviptadil “futile” in I-SPY COVID-19 trial
© 2023 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy