https://doi.org/10.55788/1db5c2a8
Prolonged ECG monitoring led to the detection of significantly more arrhythmias in patients with non-high-risk hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) than in standard ECG monitoring. This was the main result of the TEMPO-HCM study.
The prospective, observational, multicentre TEMPO-HCM study assessed whether extended ECG monitoring (30 days) resulted in the detection of more relevant arrhythmias than standard 24-hour monitoring in patients with non-high-risk HCM [1]. The relevant arrhythmias were atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter, and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT). All included patients underwent 30-day ECG monitoring. Dr Juan Caro-Codón (La Paz University Hospital, Spain) presented the results of the first 100 patients.
In the first 24 hours of monitoring, the detection rate of relevant arrhythmias was 11%, whereas 30 days of monitoring resulted in a detection rate of 65% (P<0.001). The effect of prolonged monitoring was mainly driven by increased detection of NSVTs, with 8% in 24 hours and 62% in 30 days (P<0.001). Dr Caro Codón added that there were 6 cases of AF detected after 24 hours and an additional 4 cases after 30 days. “Although this result did not reach statistical significance, prolonged monitoring may have a role in the detection of AF in patients with HCM,” he said. Finally, Dr Caro-Codón emphasised that approximately 60% of the included patients have NSVT, which warrants further investigation into its role as a risk factor for sudden cardiac death.
-
- Caro-Codón J, et al. Extended ECG monitoring in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the TEMPO-HCM study. Late-Breaking Science Day 2, EHRA 2023, 16–18 April, Barcelona, Spain.
Copyright ©2023 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
« Does adaptive pacing work in patients with HF, LBBB, and intact AV conduction? Next Article
Can ICD-EG-derived information improve ventricular tachycardia ablation outcomes? »
Table of Contents: EHRA 2023
Featured articles
CEASE-AF meets primary endpoint in persistent AF
ANTWERP score selects HF patients for AF ablation
Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Surgery saves lives in patients with oesophageal fistula
MANIFEST-PF: Good results for the pentaspline PFA catheter
POWER FAST III: High-power, short-duration radiofrequency ablation for AF
High-power, short-duration ablation linked to a higher stroke risk
Early or delayed ablation for AF?
CEASE-AF meets primary endpoint in persistent AF
Promising results for Marshall Plan ablation strategy
Updates on Devices
Can ICD-EG-derived information improve ventricular tachycardia ablation outcomes?
Prolonged ECG monitoring detects relevant arrhythmias in HCM
Does adaptive pacing work in patients with HF, LBBB, and intact AV conduction?
Can we identify patients who may not benefit from ICD therapy?
Miscellaneous
Statins display benefits for AF patients in a large population-based study
ANTWERP score selects HF patients for AF ablation
Epicardial ablation successful in Brugada syndrome
Highly increased risk of arrhythmias after mechanical ventilation for COVID-19
Related Articles

Does vilobelimab reduce mortality in severe COVID-19?
Evidence-based advocacy for people affected by brain tumours
© 2023 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy