https://doi.org/10.55788/83fd657b
The phase 3 SCORED trial (NCT03315143) compared the treatment of sotagliflozin with placebo in 10,584 patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The primary endpoint of risk of complex events such as cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalisation, and emergency room visit for heart failure was met, and published last year, showing that sotagliflozin reduced the risk for cardiovascular outcomes [1].
At the ACC Scientific Session, Prof. Deepak Bhatt (Brigham and Women's Hospital, MA, USA) presented a pre-specified, secondary analysis of the SCORED results, looking specifically at the 16-month effect of sotagliflozin versus placebo for the combined incidence of total MACE, which included cardiovascular death, first and recurrent episodes of non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke [2]. The new analysis compared the 5,144 randomised participants who entered the trial with a history of CVD with the 5,440 participants without CVD history. CVD history included myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularisation, and peripheral vascular disease.
The incidence of MACE (including first and recurrent events), total myocardial infarction (non-fatal and fatal), and total stroke (non-fatal and fatal) was reduced in patients with CVD history treated with sotagliflozin by up to 23%. These cardiovascular benefits were consistent in a subgroup analysis in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) and those with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF).
In those without CVD history, sotagliflozin reduced the risk of total cardiovascular events by 26% compared with placebo, indicating that the effect was similar (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63–0.88; P<0.001). Likewise, the outcomes for total myocardial infarction and total stroke were similar. Sotagliflozin lowered the risk of myocardial infarction by 31% in CVD-history patients compared with placebo. In those without CVD history, treatment with sotagliflozin did not achieve statistical significance but lowered the risk by 34% compared with the placebo. The reduction in MACE was consistent across patients with coronary artery disease (HR 0.79), cerebrovascular disease (HR 0.72), and peripheral arterial disease (HR 0.77).
In a meta-analysis of MACE in 4 sotagliflozin studies with a placebo comparator, totalling 20,292 patients, Prof. Bhatt noted that sotagliflozin reduced the risk of MACE by 21% (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.64–0.96; P=0.02). “These benefits showed a significant difference from the placebo group from the third month of treatment,” he said.
- Bhatt DL, et al. N Engl J Med 2021;384:129–139.
- Bhatt DL, et al. Sotagliflozin Significantly Reduces Cardiovascular Death, Myocardial Infarction, And Stroke In The SCORED Trial. Abstract 403–08, ACC 2022, 2–4 April, Washington DC, USA.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Omecamtiv mecarbil does not impact exercise capacity of patients with HFrEF Next Article
Surprise outcome for SODIUM-HF »
« Omecamtiv mecarbil does not impact exercise capacity of patients with HFrEF Next Article
Surprise outcome for SODIUM-HF »
Table of Contents: ACC 2022
Featured articles
Alirocumab significantly reduces high-risk coronary plaques
Highlighted Original Research
POISE-3: Tranexamic acid for non-cardiac surgery
Treating chronic mild hypertension during pregnancy leads to better outcomes
New VOYAGER PAD data: Should patients with both PAD and CKD get rivaroxaban?
Alirocumab significantly reduces high-risk coronary plaques
Aggressive warming during non-cardiac surgery does not improve outcomes
Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathy
DIAMOND trial: Patiromer lowers risk of severe hyperkalaemia
Replacing septal reduction therapy with mavacamten for HCM
Omecamtiv mecarbil does not impact exercise capacity of patients with HFrEF
Symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: long-term mavacamten control
Interventional and Structural Cardiology
COMPLETE revascularisation improves angina-related QoL
Plot twist for negative FAME 3 results: early QoL benefits of PCI
1-year CLASP TR results support tricuspid regurgitation repair
Head-to-head: post-TAVR edoxaban not better than DAPT
Chocolate Touch vs Lutonix catheters
No FLAVOUR difference between FFR and IVUS for PCI guidance
Myocardial Infarction
Low-resource countries benefit from global STEMI initiative
Sodium thiosulfate ineffective at cardiac protection
ICM-guided management did not improve MACE after MI
Prevention
PACIFIC-AF: Low bleeding rates for asundexian in atrial fibrillation
RCT-IVVE trial: Do HF patients benefit from annual flu shots?
TRANSLATE-TIMI 70: Primary endpoint met but safety concerns for vupanorsen
Lipoprotein(a) slashed by 98% in APOLLO trial
Dietary intervention from your supermarket
Related Articles
June 15, 2022
Chocolate Touch vs Lutonix catheters
June 15, 2022
Head-to-head: post-TAVR edoxaban not better than DAPT
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com