https://doi.org/10.55788/84cf30ae
The OCTOBER trial (NCT03171311) assessed whether stepwise, OCT-guided PCI improved clinical outcomes compared with angiography-guided PCI in 1,201 patients with stable or unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with true bifurcation lesions [1,2]. OCT was applied before stent implantation, after rewiring, and to perform a final evaluation. The primary outcome measure was a composite of cardiac death, target-lesion myocardial infarction (MI), or ischaemia-driven target-lesion revascularisation at 2 years. Dr Lene Nyhus Andreasen (Aarhus University, Denmark) presented the primary results.
In the OCT-guided PCI arm, 10.1% of the participants had a major cardiovascular event, compared with 14.1% in the angiography-guided PCI arm,
thus meeting the primary endpoint (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50–0.98; P=0.035; see Figure). “The study was underpowered for the secondary outcomes, which were mainly the individual components of the primary outcome,” noted Dr Nyhus Andreasen. Cardiac death occurred in 1.4% and 2.6% of the participants in the experimental arm and the control arm, respectively (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.22–1.25). Target-lesion MI was observed in 7.8% of the participants in the OCT-guided PCI arm and 8.5% of those in the angiography-guided PCI arm (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.60–1.34). Ischaemia-driven target-lesion revascularisation was reported in 2.8% and 4.6% of the participants, numerically favouring the experimental arm (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.32–1.13). Finally, the procedural safety did not differ between the 2 study arms.
Figure: Primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events [1]
CI, confidence interval; OCT, optical coherence tomography; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Nyhus Andreasen L, et al. OCTOBER: OCT or angiography guidance for PCI in complex bifurcation lesions. Hot Line Session 4, ESC Congress 2023, 25–28 August, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Holm NR, et al. N Engl J Med 2023; Aug 27. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307770.
Copyright ©2023 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Diagnostic tool doubles cardiovascular diagnoses in patients with COPD or diabetes Next Article
DAPT or clopidogrel monotherapy after stenting in high-risk East-Asian patients? »
« Diagnostic tool doubles cardiovascular diagnoses in patients with COPD or diabetes Next Article
DAPT or clopidogrel monotherapy after stenting in high-risk East-Asian patients? »
Table of Contents: ESC 2023
Featured articles
How to manage arterial thrombosis and thromboembolism in COVID-19?
2023 ESC Guidelines & Updates
Heart failure: the 2023 update
Guidelines for Acute Coronary Syndrome
Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies
Cardiovascular disease and diabetes: new guidelines
Guidelines for the management of endocarditis
Trial Updates in Heart Failure
Traditional Chinese medicine successful in HFrEF
CRT upgrade benefits patients with HFrEF and an ICD
Catheter ablation saves lives in end-stage HF with AF
Meta-analysis: Does FCM improve clinical outcomes in HF?
HEART-FID: Is intravenous ferric carboxymaltose helpful in HFrEF with iron deficiency?
Natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy to facilitate decongestion in acute HF
DICTATE-AHF: Early dapagliflozin to manage acute HF
STEP-HFpEF: Semaglutide safe and efficacious in HFpEF plus obesity
Key Research on Prevention
Does colchicine prevent perioperative AF and MINS?
Diagnostic tool doubles cardiovascular diagnoses in patients with COPD or diabetes
Inorganic nitrate strongly reduces CIN in high-risk patients undergoing angiography
Finetuning Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapy
Should we use anticoagulation in AHRE to prevent stroke?
Results of FRAIL-AF trial suggest increased bleeding risk with DOACs
The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy in cancer patients with DVT
DAPT or clopidogrel monotherapy after stenting in high-risk East-Asian patients?
Assets for ACS and PCI Optimisation
Immediate or staged revascularisation in STEMI plus multivessel disease?
Lp(a) and cardiovascular events: which test is the best?
No benefit of extracorporeal life support in MI plus cardiogenic shock
Functional revascularisation outperforms culprit-only strategy in older MI patients
Can aspirin be omitted after PCI in patients with high bleeding risk?
Angiography vs OCT vs IVUS guidance for PCI: a network meta-analysis
OCTOBER trial: OCT-guided PCI improves clinical outcomes in bifurcation lesions
Other
Minimising atrial pacing does not reduce the risk for AF in sinus node disease
ARAMIS: Can anakinra alleviate acute myocarditis?
Expedited transfer to a specialised centre does not improve cardiac arrest outcomes
Acoramidis improves survival and functional status in ATTR-CM
Related Articles
October 30, 2023
Angiography vs OCT vs IVUS guidance for PCI: a network meta-analysis
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com