Prof. Shomron Ben-Horin (Tel-Aviv University, Israel) and colleagues conducted a systematic review to assess the treatment effect of biologic therapies in patients with short duration (≤18 months) and long duration (>18 months) IBD [1,2]. The study included 25 trials, investigating infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, natalizumab, or vedolizumab with a total of 9,395 patients with IBD. The primary endpoint was the proportional benefit of biologic treatments compared with placebo with regard to the induction of remissiona.
The relative benefit of active treatment versus placebo was similar for participants with short-term CD (risk ratio 1.47; 95% CI 1.01–2.15) or long-term CD (risk ratio 1.43; 95% CI 1.19–1.72). In addition, no significant interaction effect was reported for treatment effect and disease duration (P=0.585). Similarly, for participants with ulcerative colitis (UC), the active-to-placebo treatment relative benefit was not significantly different between participants with short-term disease (risk ratio 1.82; 95% CI 1.12–2.97) or long-term disease (risk ratio 2.21; 95% CI 1.79–2.72). Notably, the absolute effects of both biologics and placebo were higher in participants with short-term CD compared with participants with long-term CD. In the UC population, this pattern was not observed (see Figure).
Figure: Absolute effects of biologics and placebo in IBD [1,2]
Reprinted from Shomron Ben-Horin et al. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(2):482-494. Doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.037 under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
Prof. Ben-Horin argued that the greater absolute benefits of both active therapy and placebo may be due to the greater plasticity of early CD. Another explanation may be that patients with early disease show a higher placebo response because they are more amenable to suggestions. However, further studies are warranted to investigate the explanations behind the observed larger absolute treatment effect in patients with early CD.
a. Induction of remissions for CD was defined as a Crohn’s Disease Activity Index <150 and for UC as a total Mayo score ≤2 with no individual subscore >1.
- Ben-Horin S, et al. Efficacy of biologic drugs in short-duration versus long-duration Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A systematic review and an individual-patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. DOP62, ECCO 2022, 16–19 February.
- Ben-Horin S, et al. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(2):482–494.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« RESTORE-UC: No better outcomes with FMT superdonors than with autologous stools Next Article
Comparable safety profiles of biological therapies in elderly patients with IBD »
« RESTORE-UC: No better outcomes with FMT superdonors than with autologous stools Next Article
Comparable safety profiles of biological therapies in elderly patients with IBD »
Table of Contents: ECCO 2022
Featured articles
Upadacitinib maintenance therapy delivers sustained improvements in active ulcerative colitis
Novel Treatment Modalities
Guselkumab shows encouraging safety and efficacy in ulcerative colitis
Guselkumab maintenance therapy achieved high efficacy rates in Crohn’s disease
Mirikizumab efficacious for active ulcerative colitis
Risankizumab more efficacious in colonic than in ileal Crohn’s disease
Guselkumab plus golimumab promising combination for ulcerative colitis
Combined endpoint may support personalised medicine in ulcerative colitis
Filgotinib seems promising for perianal fistulising Crohn’s disease
Upadacitinib maintenance therapy delivers sustained improvements in active ulcerative colitis
Upadacitinib counters extraintestinal manifestations in ulcerative colitis
Deucravacitinib does not meet primary endpoint for ulcerative colitis
Head-to-Head Comparisons
Anti-TNFs versus vedolizumab and ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease
Upadacitinib appears to be an efficacious therapy for moderately-to-severely ulcerative colitis
Subcutaneous infliximab versus subcutaneous vedolizumab in IBD
Vedolizumab outperforms anti-TNF in biologic-naïve ulcerative colitis
Short-Term and Long-Term Treatment Results
Ozanimod treatment shows maintained response in ulcerative colitis
Stopping infliximab but not antimetabolites leads to more relapses in Crohn’s disease
Vedolizumab first approved therapy for chronic pouchitis
VEDOKIDS: Vedolizumab seems effective in paediatric IBD
Primary endpoint of 5-hydroxytryptophan for fatigue in IBD not met
Specific Therapeutic Strategies
Positive outcomes with therapeutic drug monitoring during infliximab maintenance therapy
Segmental colectomy beneficial over total colectomy in Chrohn’s disease
Modified 2-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis versus 3-stage alternative
Similar results for different corticosteroid tapering protocols in UC
Miscellaneous Topics
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for IBD management
AI model distinguishes between histologic activity and remission in ulcerative colitis
Multi-Omic and dietary analysis of Crohn’s disease identifies pathogenetic factors
Novel classification system for perianal fistulising Crohn’s disease
Vaccination tool associated with improved vaccination coverage in IBD
Comparable safety profiles of biological therapies in elderly patients with IBD
Early biologic therapy induces larger effect than delayed treatment in Crohn’s disease
RESTORE-UC: No better outcomes with FMT superdonors than with autologous stools
Related Articles
May 9, 2019
Moving towards new therapeutic options
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com