Jang et al. aimed to discover clinical predictive factors for the efficacy of osimertinib, and analysed patients with stage IV, EGFR T790M+ lung adenocarcinoma who were given osimertinib as salvage treatment in a retrospective study [1]. Various baseline clinical factors were investigated according to favourable or unfavourable osimertinib efficacy group. Unfavourable efficacy (primary resistance) was defined as progression-free survival (PFS) <6 months with osimertinib. A total of 30 patients were eligible for this analysis (19 in the favourable efficacy group and 11 in the unfavourable efficacy group). The favourable efficacy group consisted of more patients aged ≥60 years at the time of lung cancer diagnosis (P=0.058), with baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≤3.5 (P=0.058), and who had received pre-osimertinib treatment with first generation EGFR TKI (gefintinib or erlotinib) rather than second generation EGFR TKI (afatinib) (P=0.088).
It was found that PFS of favourable and unfavourable efficacy groups with osimertinib was 9.9 months (95% CI 9.5-10.3) and 3.3 months (95% CI 2.4-4.2), respectively (P<0.001). The response rate of osimertinib was 89.5% vs 18.2% (P<0.001). Age at the time of lung cancer diagnosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, baseline NLR, pre-osimertinib EGFR TKI treatment, and PFS with previous EGFR TKI were revealed as potential predictive factors through Kaplan-Meier PFS estimation. Of these, regression analysis confirmed that only age at the time of lung cancer diagnosis ≥60 years (HR 0.292, 95% CI 0.104-0.819, P=0.019) and baseline NLR ≤3.5 (HR 0.238, 95% CI 0.083-0.677, P=0.007) were good predictive factors for the efficacy of osimertinib (see Table). These easily identifiable predictive factors have been studied in a very small patient number. If they remain valid in larger patient numbers remains to be seen.
Table. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis [1]
- Jang SH, et al. P2.14-03. WCLC 2019.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Use of clinical registries in phase 4 of DMT Next Article
First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy offers durable OS benefit vs chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression »
« Use of clinical registries in phase 4 of DMT Next Article
First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy offers durable OS benefit vs chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression »
Table of Contents: WCLC 2019
Featured articles
Five-fold increase of OS at 5 years with nivolumab vs docetaxel
Screening, Detection, and Diagnosis
Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Five-fold increase of OS at 5 years with nivolumab vs docetaxel
Promising phase 1 results of novel KRAS-inhibitor in NSCLC
Selpercatinib (LOXO-292) shows durable activity in RET fusion-positive lung cancer
Other Thoracic Malignancies
Immuno-Oncology
Nivolumab + ipilimumab safe first-line treatment for NSCLC patients with comorbidities
Targeted Therapy
Phase 3 Trial Updates
First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy offers durable OS benefit vs chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression
Related Articles
November 19, 2021
Adjuvant atezolizumab lowers relapse rate in resected NSCLC
September 21, 2021
NSCLC metastases also benefit from nivolumab + ipilimumab + chemo
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com