In the study by Minehart et al., 2 pathologists reviewed tissue microarray from stage I-III resected lung adenocarcinomas (n=1,438), which was subsequently stained for mesothelin expression on cell-surface and cytoplasm. Of a total of 327 patients with distant recurrences, adequate tissue was available from 34 autologous metastatic sites for evaluation of mesothelin expression. Healthy donor T cells were retrovirally transduced with a mesothelin-targeted CAR. In vitro function against lung adenocarcinoma cell lines with heterogenous mesothelin expression resembling human tumours was assessed via chromium release assay, ELISA, and flow cytometry. In vivo antitumor efficacy (n=30) was evaluated by median survival and tumour bioluminescence in mice bearing lung adenocarcinoma tumours [1].
It was found that the incidence of cell-surface mesothelin expression was higher in metastases than matched primary tumours (65% vs 38%) and higher in KRAS-mutant than wild type tumours (42% vs 32%). CAR T cells secreted cytokines and lysed lung adenocarcinoma cell lines in proportion to their cell-surface mesothelin expression. No activity against mesothelin-very low mesothelial or mesothelin-negative lung adenocarcinoma cell lines was observed. In vivo, a single dose of CAR T cells eradicated established primary and metastatic mesothelin-high tumours without evidence of on-target off-tumour toxicity.
Researchers concluded that therapeutically relevant cell surface mesothelin expression is enriched in a population of KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients who have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Mesothelin-targeted CAR T cells appear safe and effective against lung adenocarcinoma, both in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, it was put forward that these results provide a strong rationale for the upcoming mesothelin-targeted CAR T cell therapy clinical trial in metastatic, KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients. However, during the discussion afterwards, it was stated that although the results of this CAR T cell therapy in lung cancer are interesting, they are still quite premature, which highlights the need for more and larger studies [1].
- Minehart J, et al. OA14.03 WCLC 2019.
Posted on
Previous Article
« Late-breaking: Continuation of natalizumab or interruption during pregnancy Next Article
High need for biomarkers for stage III lung cancer »
« Late-breaking: Continuation of natalizumab or interruption during pregnancy Next Article
High need for biomarkers for stage III lung cancer »
Table of Contents: WCLC 2019
Featured articles
Five-fold increase of OS at 5 years with nivolumab vs docetaxel
Screening, Detection, and Diagnosis
Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Five-fold increase of OS at 5 years with nivolumab vs docetaxel
Promising phase 1 results of novel KRAS-inhibitor in NSCLC
Selpercatinib (LOXO-292) shows durable activity in RET fusion-positive lung cancer
Other Thoracic Malignancies
Immuno-Oncology
Nivolumab + ipilimumab safe first-line treatment for NSCLC patients with comorbidities
Targeted Therapy
Phase 3 Trial Updates
First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy offers durable OS benefit vs chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression
Related Articles
November 21, 2018
Angiogenic and stromal biomarkers in malignant mesothelioma
June 25, 2019
Combo I-O plus chemotherapy
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com