Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) outperformed standard regimens in patients with triple class-exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The results of the phase 3 KarMMa-3 study supported the use of ide-cel in this hard-to-treat population.
“Novel therapies are needed in earlier lines of treatment for patients with MM,” stated Dr Paula Rodríguez-Otero (Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Spain) [1]. “The BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy ide-cel has displayed promising efficacy in a heavily pretreated population of patients with RRMM and we aimed to study this agent in earlier lines of therapy” [1,2]. The phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial (NCT03651128) compared ide-cel with standard treatment regimens in patients with triple class-exposed RRMM who had received 2 to 4 prior lines of therapy and were refractory to the last treatment regimen (n=386). The participants were randomised 2:1 to ide-cel or standard treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint.
The median PFS was significantly longer in patients who received ide-cel compared with those who received a standard regimen (13.3 months vs 4.4 months; HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.38–0.65; P<0.0001). “This result was consistent across subgroups, including older patients, those with a high tumour burden, and patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities,” added Dr Rodríguez-Otero. Finally, the safety data were consistent with the ide-cel toxicity profile reported in previous studies [1,3].
In conclusion, the findings of the KarMMa-3 trial support the use of ide-cel in patients with early-line relapse and triple class-exposed RRMM.
-
- Rodriguez-Otero P, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel versus standard regimens in patients with triple-class-exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: KarMMa-3, a phase 3 randomized controlled trial. GS02-10, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) 49th Annual Meeting, 23–26 April 2023, Paris, France.
- Munshi NC, et al. N Engl J Med 2021;384:705–716.
- Raje N, et al. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1726–1737.
Copyright ©2023 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
« Quizartinib provides benefits on top of ASCT in AML Next Article
Can molecular data improve prognostication in MDS patients undergoing HSCT? »
Table of Contents: EBMT 2023
Featured articles
ASCT or CAR T as first-line therapy for MM?
Ide-cel superior to standard therapies in triple-class-exposed RRMM
Online First
ASCT or CAR T as first-line therapy for MM?
DETERMINATION: Does one size fit all in multiple myeloma?
Long-term success for CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in CLL
Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine A in AML
Can molecular data improve prognostication in MDS patients undergoing HSCT?
Ide-cel superior to standard therapies in triple-class-exposed RRMM
Quizartinib provides benefits on top of ASCT in AML
Blinatumomab may improve outcomes in patients with B-cell ALL undergoing ASCT
Is ASCT a reasonable option in patients with invasive aspergillosis?
Related Articles
‘Reassuring’ data on VTE risk in COVID-19 outpatients
© 2023 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy