The VEDO-IBD study (NCT03375424) was conducted to compare vedolizumab and anti-TNF therapies head-to-head in biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients with UC (n=1,200). The real-world evidence induction study included 314 biologic-naïve participants who were treated according to the physician’s preference and reported comparable response rates among vedolizumab receivers (51.8%) and anti-TNF receivers (54.2%). The 1-year follow-up analysis conducted by Dr Bernd Bokemeyer (University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Germany) and colleagues included 274 biologic-naïve participants with UC [1]. Clinical responsea rate and clinical remissionb rates were measured.
At week 52, treatment persistence was higher among vedolizumab receivers (83.5%) than among anti-TNF receivers (59.5%; P<0.001). In addition, the modified intention-to-treat analysis showed a higher response rate for participants treated with vedolizumab compared with participants treated with anti-TNFs (61.7% vs 40.3%; OR 2.39; 95% CI 1.39–4.10). In addition, the clinical remission rates (38.2% vs 26.0%) and corticosteroid-free remission rates (36.5% vs 24.0%) were not significant in participants treated with vedolizumab. Furthermore, both treatment groups displayed a significant improvement in quality of life from baseline but no difference in improvement of quality of life was observed between treatment groups.
Dr Bokemeyer concluded that the long-term results of this study show that vedolizumab is associated with a higher treatment persistence and a slightly higher effectiveness than anti-TNFs, suggesting that vedolizumab may be the preferred biologic therapy in biologic-naïve patients with UC.
a. Clinical response is defined as a reduction of partial Mayo score from baseline to 1-year by >3 points or a reduction of at least 30% compared with baseline or reaching remission at 1-year.
b. Clinical remission is defined as a partial Mayo score ≤1 plus a bleeding subscore of 0 and no systemic use of steroids or budesonide at 1-year.
- Plachta-Danielzik S, et al. Maintenance phase propensity score adjusted effectiveness and persistence at week-52 in biologic-naïve Ulcerative Colitis patients treated with vedolizumab or anti-TNF (VEDO IBD-study). OP17, ECCO 2022, 16–19 February.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Guselkumab shows encouraging safety and efficacy in ulcerative colitis Next Article
Subcutaneous infliximab versus subcutaneous vedolizumab in IBD »
« Guselkumab shows encouraging safety and efficacy in ulcerative colitis Next Article
Subcutaneous infliximab versus subcutaneous vedolizumab in IBD »
Table of Contents: ECCO 2022
Featured articles
Upadacitinib maintenance therapy delivers sustained improvements in active ulcerative colitis
Novel Treatment Modalities
Guselkumab shows encouraging safety and efficacy in ulcerative colitis
Guselkumab maintenance therapy achieved high efficacy rates in Crohn’s disease
Mirikizumab efficacious for active ulcerative colitis
Risankizumab more efficacious in colonic than in ileal Crohn’s disease
Guselkumab plus golimumab promising combination for ulcerative colitis
Combined endpoint may support personalised medicine in ulcerative colitis
Filgotinib seems promising for perianal fistulising Crohn’s disease
Upadacitinib maintenance therapy delivers sustained improvements in active ulcerative colitis
Upadacitinib counters extraintestinal manifestations in ulcerative colitis
Deucravacitinib does not meet primary endpoint for ulcerative colitis
Head-to-Head Comparisons
Anti-TNFs versus vedolizumab and ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease
Upadacitinib appears to be an efficacious therapy for moderately-to-severely ulcerative colitis
Subcutaneous infliximab versus subcutaneous vedolizumab in IBD
Vedolizumab outperforms anti-TNF in biologic-naïve ulcerative colitis
Short-Term and Long-Term Treatment Results
Ozanimod treatment shows maintained response in ulcerative colitis
Stopping infliximab but not antimetabolites leads to more relapses in Crohn’s disease
Vedolizumab first approved therapy for chronic pouchitis
VEDOKIDS: Vedolizumab seems effective in paediatric IBD
Primary endpoint of 5-hydroxytryptophan for fatigue in IBD not met
Specific Therapeutic Strategies
Positive outcomes with therapeutic drug monitoring during infliximab maintenance therapy
Segmental colectomy beneficial over total colectomy in Chrohn’s disease
Modified 2-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis versus 3-stage alternative
Similar results for different corticosteroid tapering protocols in UC
Miscellaneous Topics
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for IBD management
AI model distinguishes between histologic activity and remission in ulcerative colitis
Multi-Omic and dietary analysis of Crohn’s disease identifies pathogenetic factors
Novel classification system for perianal fistulising Crohn’s disease
Vaccination tool associated with improved vaccination coverage in IBD
Comparable safety profiles of biological therapies in elderly patients with IBD
Early biologic therapy induces larger effect than delayed treatment in Crohn’s disease
RESTORE-UC: No better outcomes with FMT superdonors than with autologous stools
Related Articles
December 1, 2022
IL-23 inhibition reduces inflammatory biomarkers in pre-treated UC
August 11, 2021
New target to dial down inflammation and pain discovered
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com