Ozanimod is an S1P receptor modulator, approved for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active UC based on the 52-week results of the True North trial (NCT02435992) [1]. An open-label extension study was initiated to assess the long-term efficacy of ozanimod [2]. In total, 823 participants entered the open-label extension study of the True North trial, of whom 64%, 34%, and 14% completed the week 46, week 94, and week 142 time points, respectively. Lack of efficacy (21%) and withdrawal by subject (13%) were the main reasons for treatment discontinuations. Prof. Silvio Danese (Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Italy) presented the results.
Observed-case analysis showed maintained clinical remissiona rates at week 46 (45%, n=203/452), week 94 (51%, n=109/213), and week 142 (45%, n=39/87). Among participants who displayed a clinical responseb upon open-label extension entry, clinical remission rates were sustained at week 46 (70%, n=107/152) and week 94 (69%, n=42/61). Furthermore, clinical responses, endoscopic improvement rates, and corticosteroid-free remission rates demonstrated similar patterns of maintained efficacy of ozanimod in the study population.
No new safety issues were reported with the long-term use of ozanimod. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were lymphopoenia (10.3%; n=119), anaemia (7.9%; n=91), and nasopharyngitis (7.5%; n=87). Serious TEAEs were observed in 14% (n=162) of the participants. UC worsening (3.9%; n=45) was the only serious TEAE that occurred in more than 1% of the participants.
In conclusion, the current interim analysis of the True North open-label extension study demonstrated the long-term durability of efficacy and safety of ozanimod therapy in participants with moderately-to-severely active UC.
a. Clinical remission is defined as a rectal-bleeding subscore of 0; a stool-frequency subscore of ≤1 or less, with a decrease of at least 1 point from baseline; and an endoscopy subscore of 1 or less (all on scales from 0 [none] to 3 [most severe]).
b. Clinical response is defined as a reduction in the total Mayo score of ≥3 points and ≥30% from baseline or in the three-component Mayo score of ≥2 points and ≥35% from baseline, as well as a reduction in the rectal-bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or an absolute rectal-bleeding subscore of ≤1 point.
- Sandborn WJ, et al. NEJM. 2021;385:1280–1291.
- Danese S, et al. Long-term use of ozanimod in patients with moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis. DOP44, ECCO 2022, 16–19 February.
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Stopping infliximab but not antimetabolites leads to more relapses in Crohn’s disease Next Article
Similar results for different corticosteroid tapering protocols in UC »
« Stopping infliximab but not antimetabolites leads to more relapses in Crohn’s disease Next Article
Similar results for different corticosteroid tapering protocols in UC »
Table of Contents: ECCO 2022
Featured articles
Upadacitinib maintenance therapy delivers sustained improvements in active ulcerative colitis
Novel Treatment Modalities
Guselkumab shows encouraging safety and efficacy in ulcerative colitis
Guselkumab maintenance therapy achieved high efficacy rates in Crohn’s disease
Mirikizumab efficacious for active ulcerative colitis
Risankizumab more efficacious in colonic than in ileal Crohn’s disease
Guselkumab plus golimumab promising combination for ulcerative colitis
Combined endpoint may support personalised medicine in ulcerative colitis
Filgotinib seems promising for perianal fistulising Crohn’s disease
Upadacitinib maintenance therapy delivers sustained improvements in active ulcerative colitis
Upadacitinib counters extraintestinal manifestations in ulcerative colitis
Deucravacitinib does not meet primary endpoint for ulcerative colitis
Head-to-Head Comparisons
Anti-TNFs versus vedolizumab and ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease
Upadacitinib appears to be an efficacious therapy for moderately-to-severely ulcerative colitis
Subcutaneous infliximab versus subcutaneous vedolizumab in IBD
Vedolizumab outperforms anti-TNF in biologic-naïve ulcerative colitis
Short-Term and Long-Term Treatment Results
Ozanimod treatment shows maintained response in ulcerative colitis
Stopping infliximab but not antimetabolites leads to more relapses in Crohn’s disease
Vedolizumab first approved therapy for chronic pouchitis
VEDOKIDS: Vedolizumab seems effective in paediatric IBD
Primary endpoint of 5-hydroxytryptophan for fatigue in IBD not met
Specific Therapeutic Strategies
Positive outcomes with therapeutic drug monitoring during infliximab maintenance therapy
Segmental colectomy beneficial over total colectomy in Chrohn’s disease
Modified 2-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis versus 3-stage alternative
Similar results for different corticosteroid tapering protocols in UC
Miscellaneous Topics
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for IBD management
AI model distinguishes between histologic activity and remission in ulcerative colitis
Multi-Omic and dietary analysis of Crohn’s disease identifies pathogenetic factors
Novel classification system for perianal fistulising Crohn’s disease
Vaccination tool associated with improved vaccination coverage in IBD
Comparable safety profiles of biological therapies in elderly patients with IBD
Early biologic therapy induces larger effect than delayed treatment in Crohn’s disease
RESTORE-UC: No better outcomes with FMT superdonors than with autologous stools
Related Articles
June 14, 2022
Antibiotic use elevates IBD risks in senior citizens
December 1, 2022
Another chance for TYK2 inhibition in UC
March 8, 2022
ECCO 2022 Highlights Podcast
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com