Prof. Stephanie Wheeler (University of North Carolina, USA) shared the results of her team’s investigation into the use of OAAs [1]. First, they note that OAAs offer several advantages; they are less invasive than intravenously administered drugs and they offer greater convenience and flexibility regarding location of administration. However, the use of OAAs also has potential disadvantages, including the risk of interactions with food or other drugs, difficulty in taking the agent due to odynophagia (i.e. painful swallowing), risk of missed doses, and, typically, increased cost.
The investigators sought to identify which patients would be more likely to adopt the use of OAAs following a diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). They retrospectively analysed data from the records of 713 patients contained in a registry-linked, multi-payer claims database to discover patterns associated with use of multiple OAAs (i.e. axitinib, cabozantinib, everolimus, lenvatinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, and sunitinib). All patients had been diagnosed with mRCC and were only included if they had been enrolled in the database for ≥12 months after diagnosis.
Unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence limits were estimated for associations between use of OAAs and certain patient characteristics. Results demonstrated only a 37% usage of OAAs by the patients. Moreover, there was a definite trend towards lower uptake by patients who were older, frail, and had a greater burden of comorbidities. Other patient characteristics such as sex, race/ethnicity, urban versus rural, or public versus private insurance proved not to be predictive of OAA use.
More research into these patterns is warranted so that decisions regarding highest quality patient care can be guided by appropriate guiding principles.
- Wheeler S. Patterns and predictors of oral anticancer agent utilization in diverse metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Abstract 279, ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, 11-13 February 2021.
Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Denosumab plus pembrolizumab in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma Next Article
Cabozantinib as possible new first-line therapy in translocation renal cell carcinoma »
« Denosumab plus pembrolizumab in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma Next Article
Cabozantinib as possible new first-line therapy in translocation renal cell carcinoma »
Table of Contents: ASCO GU 2021
Featured articles
Prostate Cancer
Lu177 as a promising new therapy for metastatic prostate cancer
Role of prostate cancer genomics is evolving
Apalutamide prolongs progression-free survival in prostate cancer
Dose-intensified radiation therapy fails to provide better outcomes in prostate cancer
Intrinsic tumour biology may be predictive of treatment response in prostate cancer
Final TITAN trial results favour use of apalutamide
Penile Cancer
Prognosis of penile cancer associated with HPV status
Renal Cancer
Superior clinical outcomes and QoL with nivolumab plus cabozantinib in RCC
Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab prolongs survival in renal cell carcinoma
Inflammatory markers may guide treatment decisions in metastatic renal cell cancer
Clinical trial exclusion criteria may lead to lack of evidence in real-world patients: how do the excluded fare?
Axitinib offers hope for improving renal cell cancer surgical outcomes
Cabozantinib as possible new first-line therapy in translocation renal cell carcinoma
Predictors of oral anti-cancer agent utilisation in renal cell carcinoma
Denosumab plus pembrolizumab in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Testicular Cancer
New prediction model for brain metastasis in germ cell tumours
Reduction in radiation exposure is possible in testicular seminoma surveillance
New therapeutic option for early metastatic seminoma
Urothelial Cancer
Poorer outcomes in bladder cancer predicted by race/ethnicity and gender
Enfortumab vedotin as a promising treatment option for bladder cancer: phase 3 results
Enfortumab vedotin as a promising treatment option for bladder cancer: phase 2 results
New standard of care recommended for patients with upper tract urothelial cancer
Signature DNA alterations in subtypes of bladder cancer
ACE inhibitors associated with superior responses in bladder cancer
Better allocation of research dollars needed
Better prediction of favourable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors in mUC
Genitourinary Oncology
Researchers call for an overhaul of licensing and funding of anti-cancer drugs
Exploring a new strategy for metastatic germ cell tumours
Related Articles
November 25, 2020
Second- and third-line treatment options in mUC
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com