The CheckMate 9ER trial (NCT03141177) is a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial investigating whether nivolumab combined with cabozantinib is a safe and effective intervention compared with sunitinib in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic RCC [1]. Included patients (n=651) were randomised to nivolumab plus cabozantinib (n=323) or sunitinib (n=328) as first-line therapy until either progression of the cancer or unacceptable toxicity, with a maximum treatment duration of 2 years.
Primary and secondary outcomes were reported previously and published recently, with the primary aim of progression-free survival being superior for nivolumab plus cabozantinib after a median follow-up of 18.1 months (HR 0.51; P<0.0001) [2,3]. Both key secondary outcome measures overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) were superior in the nivolumab plus cabozantinib group (HR 0.60; OS, P=0.001; ORR, P<0.0001).
The current analysis, presented by Prof. David Cella (Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Northwestern University, Illinois, USA), focused on in-depth health-related quality of life patient-reported outcomes, utilising 2 instruments: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19) and the 3-level version of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions scale (EQ-5D-3L) [1]. Participants in both study arms were invited to complete the questionnaires at baseline (>93% completion rate) and common on-treatment and follow-up visits (≥80% completion rate).
Participants receiving nivolumab plus cabozantinib reported a smaller treatment burden than those receiving sunitinib. Patients in the nivolumab plus cabozantinib treatment arm had both a decreased risk of confirmed deterioration and a delay in deterioration. Patients in the nivolumab plus cabozantinib arm demonstrated a significantly better FKSI-19 total score (mean change 2.9; P<0.0001) and subscale scores of disease-related symptoms (DRS; mean change 1.55; P<0.0001), DRS-physical, DRS-emotional, and functional well-being (P<0.05 for all subscores). EQ-5D-3L scores were in favour of nivolumab plus cabozantinib compared with sunitinib for both utility index (mean change 0.05; P=0.0005) and visual analogue scale (mean change 3.26; P=0.0011).
Overall, these results demonstrated that patients with untreated advanced or metastatic RCC can benefit from both favourable clinical outcomes and improved quality of life when treated with nivolumab plus cabozantinib instead of sunitinib.
- Cella D, et al. Patient-reported outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) treated with first-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib: The CheckMate 9ER trial. Abstract 285, ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, 11–13 February 2021.
- Choueiri TK, et al. Presentation 6960, ESMO Virtual Congress 2020, 19–21 September.
- Choueiri TK, et al. N Engl J Med 2021, 4 March; 384:829–841.
Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab prolongs survival in renal cell carcinoma Next Article
New therapeutic option for early metastatic seminoma »
« Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab prolongs survival in renal cell carcinoma Next Article
New therapeutic option for early metastatic seminoma »
Table of Contents: ASCO GU 2021
Featured articles
Prostate Cancer
Lu177 as a promising new therapy for metastatic prostate cancer
Role of prostate cancer genomics is evolving
Apalutamide prolongs progression-free survival in prostate cancer
Dose-intensified radiation therapy fails to provide better outcomes in prostate cancer
Intrinsic tumour biology may be predictive of treatment response in prostate cancer
Final TITAN trial results favour use of apalutamide
Penile Cancer
Prognosis of penile cancer associated with HPV status
Renal Cancer
Superior clinical outcomes and QoL with nivolumab plus cabozantinib in RCC
Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab prolongs survival in renal cell carcinoma
Inflammatory markers may guide treatment decisions in metastatic renal cell cancer
Clinical trial exclusion criteria may lead to lack of evidence in real-world patients: how do the excluded fare?
Axitinib offers hope for improving renal cell cancer surgical outcomes
Cabozantinib as possible new first-line therapy in translocation renal cell carcinoma
Predictors of oral anti-cancer agent utilisation in renal cell carcinoma
Denosumab plus pembrolizumab in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Testicular Cancer
New prediction model for brain metastasis in germ cell tumours
Reduction in radiation exposure is possible in testicular seminoma surveillance
New therapeutic option for early metastatic seminoma
Urothelial Cancer
Poorer outcomes in bladder cancer predicted by race/ethnicity and gender
Enfortumab vedotin as a promising treatment option for bladder cancer: phase 3 results
Enfortumab vedotin as a promising treatment option for bladder cancer: phase 2 results
New standard of care recommended for patients with upper tract urothelial cancer
Signature DNA alterations in subtypes of bladder cancer
ACE inhibitors associated with superior responses in bladder cancer
Better allocation of research dollars needed
Better prediction of favourable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors in mUC
Genitourinary Oncology
Researchers call for an overhaul of licensing and funding of anti-cancer drugs
Exploring a new strategy for metastatic germ cell tumours
Related Articles
November 25, 2020
Abiraterone in M1 hormone-naïve prostate cancer
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com