Some mRCC patients experience a prolonged time between initial diagnosis and disease progression. Systemic treatment of mRCC can be both toxic and non-curative; therefore, patients who experience an indolent disease course are usually placed on active surveillance, delaying treatment until there are signs of disease progression. However, it can be challenging to identify which patients will be appropriately managed by active surveillance and to determine when patients on active surveillance should begin systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT). To predict survival in mRCC, inflammatory biomarkers and a patient’s International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score are used.
Ms Vishwani Chauhan (University of Edinburgh, UK) presented the current retrospective study that included patients diagnosed with mRCC who were on active surveillance [1]. The relationship was assessed between 6 key inflammatory biomarkers (i.e. haemoglobin, white cell count, neutrophil count, platelets, CRP, and albumin) and time to initiation of SACT.
The primary endpoint was time from diagnosis to initiation of SACT. Of the 126 patient records examined, 66 patients (52.4%) initiated SACT, with a median time between diagnosis and SACT initiation of 17.2 months. Of the remaining 60 patients, 17 (13.5%) had died while on active surveillance; this group had a median survival time of 40.4 months. The final 43 patients (34.1%) remained on active surveillance and were followed for a median period of 39.6 months.
Both CRP and albumin were predictive of duration of active surveillance (P=0.01 and P=0.049, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that only CRP was independently associated with time between diagnosis and initiation of SACT (P=0.035).
These results suggest that some patients diagnosed with mRCC may be appropriately managed by active surveillance for a considerable period and suggest that monitoring of CRP levels can contribute to the timing of the decision to initiate SACT.
- Chauhan V. Prognostic biomarkers of systemic inflammation in patients on active surveillance for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A biobank analysis. Abstract 348, ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, 11–13 February 2021.
Copyright ©2021 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Clinical trial exclusion criteria may lead to lack of evidence in real-world patients: how do the excluded fare? Next Article
Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab prolongs survival in renal cell carcinoma »
« Clinical trial exclusion criteria may lead to lack of evidence in real-world patients: how do the excluded fare? Next Article
Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab prolongs survival in renal cell carcinoma »
Table of Contents: ASCO GU 2021
Featured articles
Prostate Cancer
Lu177 as a promising new therapy for metastatic prostate cancer
Role of prostate cancer genomics is evolving
Apalutamide prolongs progression-free survival in prostate cancer
Dose-intensified radiation therapy fails to provide better outcomes in prostate cancer
Intrinsic tumour biology may be predictive of treatment response in prostate cancer
Final TITAN trial results favour use of apalutamide
Penile Cancer
Prognosis of penile cancer associated with HPV status
Renal Cancer
Superior clinical outcomes and QoL with nivolumab plus cabozantinib in RCC
Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab prolongs survival in renal cell carcinoma
Inflammatory markers may guide treatment decisions in metastatic renal cell cancer
Clinical trial exclusion criteria may lead to lack of evidence in real-world patients: how do the excluded fare?
Axitinib offers hope for improving renal cell cancer surgical outcomes
Cabozantinib as possible new first-line therapy in translocation renal cell carcinoma
Predictors of oral anti-cancer agent utilisation in renal cell carcinoma
Denosumab plus pembrolizumab in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Testicular Cancer
New prediction model for brain metastasis in germ cell tumours
Reduction in radiation exposure is possible in testicular seminoma surveillance
New therapeutic option for early metastatic seminoma
Urothelial Cancer
Poorer outcomes in bladder cancer predicted by race/ethnicity and gender
Enfortumab vedotin as a promising treatment option for bladder cancer: phase 3 results
Enfortumab vedotin as a promising treatment option for bladder cancer: phase 2 results
New standard of care recommended for patients with upper tract urothelial cancer
Signature DNA alterations in subtypes of bladder cancer
ACE inhibitors associated with superior responses in bladder cancer
Better allocation of research dollars needed
Better prediction of favourable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors in mUC
Genitourinary Oncology
Researchers call for an overhaul of licensing and funding of anti-cancer drugs
Exploring a new strategy for metastatic germ cell tumours
Related Articles
December 3, 2021
Bayer’s Nubeqa drug improves survival in prostate cancer trial
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com