https://doi.org/10.55788/adef9767
“SHR0302 is an orally administered, highly selective inhibitor of JAK1. The selectivity of SHR0302 for JAK1 is 9 times greater than that for JAK2,” described Dr Jinjing Liu (Peking Union Medical College Hospital, China) [1]. Due to encouraging results in phase 2 (NCT03254966), the compound advanced to a multicentre phase 3 trial (NCT04333771) including 566 adults with moderate-to-severe active RA [1]. Participants with previous inadequate responses to conventional synthetic DMARDs were randomised to either placebo or SHR0302 at doses of 4 mg or 8 mg daily. After the core phase of 24 weeks, the rate of participants achieving ACR20 was evaluated as the primary endpoint. In an extension period up to week 52, participants on placebo were switched to 4 mg of SHR0302, while the other groups continued their preceding medication.
Baseline values showed a mean age of 51 years, 55.6–62.8% of participants in ACR functional class 2, a mean C-reactive protein level between 15.5 and 19.4 mg/L, and a mean swollen joint count ranging from 11.9–12.9.
Both SHR0302 groups reached the primary endpoint with significantly more participants achieving ACR20 than placebo: 70.4% on 4 mg (P<0.0001) and 75.1% on 8 mg (P<0.0001) compared with 40.4% on placebo. The ACR50 responses followed a similar pattern with 46.0% (P<0.0001), 57.1% (P<0.0001), and 15.4%, respectively. On the higher dose, just under a third of the participants also attained ACR70.
“These improvements were sustained throughout the 52-week treatment, and the placebo group which switched to SHR0302 4 mg also demonstrated favourable outcomes,” Dr Liu pointed out. She added that various patient-reported measures demonstrated significant ameliorations too.
Safety evaluations up to week 24 found incidences of adverse events in 81.5% (4 mg), 90.5% (8 mg), and 79.3% (placebo) of the participants. The most common adverse events were respiratory tract infections and hyperlipidaemia on SHR0302, besides respiratory tract infections and anaemia on placebo. All in all, Dr Liu regarded SHR0302 as generally well tolerated with a manageable safety profile.
“This study suggests that SHR0302 might present a novel treatment option for patients with RA,” Dr Liu concluded.
- Liu J, et al. A multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study of SHR0302, a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. OP0037, EULAR 2024 Congress, 12–15 June, Vienna, Austria.
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Macrophage profiling in synovial tissue predicts treatment response in RA Next Article
Small protein targeting IL-17A effective in PsA management »
« Macrophage profiling in synovial tissue predicts treatment response in RA Next Article
Small protein targeting IL-17A effective in PsA management »
Table of Contents: EULAR 2024
Featured articles
Advanced therapies show promising results in PsA real-world study
Small protein targeting IL-17A effective in PsA management
Late-breaking Abstracts
Nipocalimab meets primary endpoint in Sjögren’s syndrome
Advanced therapies show promising results in PsA real-world study
Dual IL-17A/F blocker significantly reduces spinal radiographic progression in radiographic axSpA
Small protein targeting IL-17A effective in PsA management
Spotlight on Rheumatoid Arthritis
New JAK1 inhibitor outperforms placebo in active RA
Macrophage profiling in synovial tissue predicts treatment response in RA
Innovative app boosts mental health in patients with RA
What is New in Lupus and Scleroderma
Daratumumab shows promise in systemic lupus erythematosus
Severe lung involvement in SSc linked to anti-Ro/SSA antibodies
Early treatment with ambrisentan might prevent PAH development in patients with SSc
Crystal-related Disorders in 2024
More patients hit their uric acid target with febuxostat and ruzinurad combination
Tophaceous gout at higher mortality risk than non-tophaceous gout
JAK Inhibition in Giant Cell Arteritis
Is JAK inhibition the right choice for patients with relapsing giant cell arteritis?
Giant cell arteritis: Upadacitinib may be an upcoming treatment option
Spotlight on Other Indications
AxSpA: Higher comorbidity burden worsens radiographic progression
Hope for a durable effective injection therapy in knee osteoarthritis
Dermatomyositis: Triple therapy with tacrolimus beats cyclosporin regimen
Best of the Posters
Less fracture risk with denosumab than bisphosphonates in pre-treated osteoporosis
Low IL-18: a hidden culprit of long COVID in patients with autoimmune disease
Stopping DMARDs? These key factors predict RA flares
Related Articles
January 18, 2021
Poor disease control: a risk factor for severe COVID-19
February 4, 2020
Treatment decisions should not be guided by ultrasound findings
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com