“Clinical trials of ICIs continue to exclude patients with pre-existing AID,” said Dr Greg Challener (Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, USA), who presented the results of the cohort study [1]. This is due to concerns regarding exacerbation of underlying AID, possible interference between immunosuppression for AID and ICIs, and a theoretically increased risk of serious adverse events. Yet, several recent studies suggest equivalent survival rates in patients with and without AID [2–4]. To assess mortality risk in a national cohort of patients with pre-existing AID being treated with ICI therapy, Dr Challener and colleagues conducted a propensity-matched cohort study. They used a large, multicentre network of electronic health records in the USA. The study population consisted of adult patients with cancer treated with ICIs (i.e. anti-PD-1/PD-L1), with or without auto-immune disease in their history. The study included 25,153 ICI participants with known AID and 78,547 participants without known AID. After 1:1 propensity score matching, there were 2 cohorts of 23,714 participants. All participants were followed for a median of 250 days.
No significant mortality difference between the AID and non-AID group was found. The mortality risk in the unmatched cohorts was 40.0% in the AID group and 38.1% in the non-AID group (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.05–1.10). In the matched cohorts, these rates were 39.8% and 40.2%, respectively (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.94–1.00).
“These results suggest that it is safe to treat patients with pre-existing AID with immunotherapy,” Dr Challener concluded. “So, these patients should not be excluded from receiving this often live-saving therapy.”
- Challener GJ, et al. Mortality in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Abstract 2532, ACR Convergence 2024, 14–19 November, Washington DC, USA.
- Tang K, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(8):1200-2.
- McCarter KR, et al. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023;5(5):e274-83.
- Ihara Y, et al. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2024;47(2):454-61.
Medical writing support was provided by Michiel Tent
Copyright ©2024 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« XG005 relieves OA symptoms in phase 2b study Next Article
TAPIR: Fully tapering off glucocorticosteroids may be a viable option for GPA »
« XG005 relieves OA symptoms in phase 2b study Next Article
TAPIR: Fully tapering off glucocorticosteroids may be a viable option for GPA »
Table of Contents: ACR 2024
Featured articles
Meet the Trialist: Prof. Philip J. Mease on the bimekizumab clinical trial program in psoriatic arthritis
ACR presents new guideline for lupus nephritis
T2T approach in women with RA can increase fertility
Online First
ACR presents new guideline for lupus nephritis
Positive results for vagus nerve stimulation in RA
Dapirolizumab pegol reduces SLE activity and corticosteroid use
NT-3 inhibitor relieves pain caused by osteoarthritis
Emapalumab rapidly controls MAS in patients with Still’s disease
Favourable benefit-risk profile of upadacitinib in giant cell arteritis
Global recruitment associated with higher placebo responses in PsA trials
TAPIR: Fully tapering off glucocorticosteroids may be a viable option for GPA
ICI therapy does not increase mortality risk in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease
XG005 relieves OA symptoms in phase 2b study
FcRn blocker nipocalimab improves disease activity in Sjögren’s disease
Anifrolumab more effective against organ damage than standard-of-care in SLE
T2T approach in women with RA can increase fertility
Post-hoc analysis of 3 large trials maps sex differences in PsA
Registry participation can enhance quality of rheumatology care
Related Articles
July 29, 2024
New JAK1 inhibitor outperforms placebo in active RA
© 2024 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
HEAD OFFICE
Laarderhoogtweg 25
1101 EB Amsterdam
The Netherlands
T: +31 85 4012 560
E: publishers@medicom-publishers.com